Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/main/.agents/skills/retrospective-walk/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gatewayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/retrospective-walk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/retrospective-walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/retrospective-walk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/retrospective-walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway/retrospective-walk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.02922 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01461 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00584 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
retrospective-walk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 335 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Retrospective Walk
Guide a change review as a narrative with evidence. Prefer this when the user needs the story of a change set, not just hunk-level inspection.
Inputs
Accept these fields when the user supplies them, and infer conservative defaults when they do not:
{
"scope": "diff | commit-range | worktree | job-id | episode-ref",
"target": "diff text, HEAD~5..HEAD, path, job id, or episode reference",
"mode": "guided | agent-driven | summary-only",
"capture_comments": true,
"models_for_why": [],
"include_prior_evidence": true
}
Default mode to guided for a human in the loop, agent-driven for automated
review, and summary-only only when explicitly requested or when interaction is
not possible. Default capture_comments to true.
Scope Resolution
Resolve the target into immutable evidence before analysis:
diff: use the supplied diff text. If the target is empty, capturegit diff --no-ext-diffandgit diff --cached --no-ext-diff.commit-range: capturegit diff --stat <range>,git diff --name-status <range>, and per-commit metadata fromgit log --format=fuller <range>.worktree: capture status, dirty file list, staged diff, and unstaged diff. Do not stash, reset, or mutate the target worktree. If deeper model/tool analysis may write files, create a disposable isolated worktree or analyze a read-only evidence packet instead.job-id: fetchllm_job_statusandllm_job_result; includecli,correlationId,sessionId, timestamps, exit status, captured output, and the bounded normalized progress snapshot actually returned. Page progress byafterProgressSeqwhen its event history matters, and record its capability and dropped count. Do not treat privacy-safe progress messages as raw reasoning, tool arguments, paths, or output evidence. Do not invent an output digest when the result has none. Personal Agent Config Kit deliberately withholds compiled context, provider output/error, and native handles from durable history; after a restart its job result may therefore be an explicit withheld marker rather than reconstructable output.episode-ref: resolve through the caller's available episode/DAG context. If no episode tool is available, record the unresolved reference and continue from any linked diff, job, receipt, or review artifacts the user supplied.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 335 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 7a7858b22da1
retrospective-walk is a skill published in the GitHub repository verivus-oss/llm-cli-gateway (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,922 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
issue-to-pr-resolver
Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end — create a worktree branch, implement the feature with tests, create a draft PR, then iteratively resolve all CI failures and review comments until the PR is clean. Use when you need to fully implement a GitHub issue from start to merge-ready. Triggers on "implement issue", "resolve…
my-pr-checker
Manage your own GitHub pull requests — check CI status, inline review comments, PR-level comments, resolve review threads, fix issues, and iterate until all checks pass and threads are resolved. Use for managing your own PRs (not external contributions). Triggers on "check my PR", "check PR", "/my-pr-checker ".
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
goal-pr
Drive a pull request to a clean state and merge it: run the review-pr skill, fix every mid-or-above finding, and repeat until no mid-or-above findings remain, then merge. Use when the user wants to finish a PR by reviewing, fixing, and merging it, or triggers on "the goal-pr skill".