Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Vibe-Marketer/plugins-and-skills --skill one-click-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vibe-Marketer/plugins-and-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibe-marketer/plugins-and-skills/one-click-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibe-marketer/plugins-and-skills/one-click-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibe-marketer/plugins-and-skills/one-click-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibe-marketer/plugins-and-skills/one-click-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibe-marketer/plugins-and-skills/one-click-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00664 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
one-click-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
What this skill does NOT cover:
- Code quality or architecture review
- Visual design aesthetics
- Technical implementation details
-
Identify the artifact type - PRD, user flow, prompt, agent spec, or other
-
Apply the Decision Test first - For each user action required:
"Would a thoughtful person regret it if we just did this for them?"
- No → Flag as automation opportunity
- Yes → Acceptable decision point, but check if it can be a confirmation vs. open question
-
Scan for principle violations - Check each of the 10 principles against the artifact
-
For AI/agent artifacts - Also apply the 7 Agent Guidelines
-
Output the review using this structure:
## One-Click Review
**Artifact:** [name/description]
**Type:** [PRD | User Flow | Prompt | Agent Spec | Other]
### Decision Test Results
[List each user action and whether it passes the test]
### Violations Found
[For each violation:]
- **Principle X:** [principle name]
- **Where:** [specific location in artifact]
- **Issue:** [what's wrong]
- **Fix:** [specific improvement]
### Automation Opportunities
[Things that could be done for the user without asking]
### Quick Wins
[Easiest changes with highest impact]
### Summary
[One paragraph: overall assessment and priority recommendations]
<evaluation_lens> When reviewing, ask these questions:
- Where is the user being asked something we could figure out ourselves?
- What fields have no default when one could be inferred?
- Where does jargon appear instead of plain language?
- What multi-step processes could be single actions?
- Where do errors require user problem-solving vs. auto-resolution?
- What decisions are being asked that the user doesn't care about?
- Is confirmation used instead of interrogation where possible? </evaluation_lens>
<success_criteria> A complete review:
- Applies the Decision Test to every user action
- Checks all 10 principles (not just the obvious ones)
- Provides specific, actionable fixes (not vague suggestions)
- Identifies at least one automation opportunity if any exist
- Ranks findings by impact
- Uses plain language in the review itself (practicing what it preaches) </success_criteria>
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 89 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 3a8b35a60a7c
one-click-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vibe-Marketer/plugins-and-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 664 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.