Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systemsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00264 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
Review Checklist
1. Correctness
- Does the code do what it claims?
- Are edge cases handled (null, empty, bounds)?
- Is error handling appropriate?
2. Security
- Input validation present?
- No SQL injection, XSS, command injection?
- Secrets not hardcoded?
- Permissions checked?
3. Performance
- No N+1 queries?
- Appropriate data structures?
- Unnecessary loops or allocations?
4. Maintainability
- Clear naming?
- Functions do one thing?
- No magic numbers?
- Tests included?
Review Format
For each issue found:
**[SEVERITY] file:line - Brief description**
Problem: What's wrong
Impact: Why it matters
Suggestion: How to fix
Severities: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, NIT
Workflow
- Read the diff or changed files
- Understand the intent (PR description, commit messages)
- Check each file against the checklist
- Summarize findings with severity levels
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 257aa72f98da
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository victordibia/designing-multiagent-systems (1,366 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 264 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.
google-agents-cli-scaffold
This skill should be used when the user wants to "create an agent project", "start a new ADK project", "build me a new agent", "add CI/CD to my project", "add deployment", "enhance my project", or "upgrade my project". Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Covers agents-cli scaffold create, scaffold enhance, and…
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
potpie-infra-architecture
Use for project infra and architecture context: environments, adapters, runtime configuration, deployments, service dependencies, datastores, API contracts, ownership, incidents, and dependency blast radius.
graph-mutation-plan
Cookbook for composing an applygraphmutations plan — stable entitykey patterns, the canonical label/edge vocabulary, evidence/invalidation/confidence discipline, and a worked example. Load this when building a non-trivial mutation plan.