Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add victusfate/scaffold --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/victusfate/scaffoldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/victusfate/scaffold/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/victusfate/scaffold/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/victusfate/scaffold/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/victusfate/scaffold/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/victusfate/scaffold/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.00140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read and follow the complete skill instructions in skills/qa.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 12 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 537ca0a4339b
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository victusfate/scaffold (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 140 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
pod-e2e
ONLY for developing Kiro Crew itself -- if the project you are working on is anything else, ignore this skill: it drives Kiro Crew's own pod tooling, which does not exist in another repository. Boots a Kiro Crew feature worktree's full stack as an ISOLATED throwaway pod and proves it boots, authenticates and renders…
nexent-daily-test
A procedure for running Nexent daily, full-layer tests on a self-hosted Ubuntu machine. Nexent is tested across separate layers such as unit, service, AI runtime, and browser journeys, with results and evidence kept locally.
tfp-verification
Generate a deterministic report for disposable executor acceptance tests.
relay-80-100-workflow
Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite…
browser-testing-with-screenshots
Use when testing web applications with visual verification - automates Chrome browser interactions, element selection, and screenshot capture for confirming UI functionality.
visual-regression
Detect unintended UI changes with reproducible rendered screenshots and reviewed baselines. Use when adding screenshot checks or investigating layout/theme regressions; do not approve a changed image merely to make the test green.