Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vigolium/piolium --skill codeqlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vigolium/pioliumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/codeql)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/codeql"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigolium/piolium/codeql/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/codeql"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigolium/piolium/codeql.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.03553 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01421 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00711 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00355 |
Grade A, and why
codeql scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to codeql — 24 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 282 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CodeQL Analysis
Supported languages: Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, Swift.
Skill resources: Reference files and templates are located at {baseDir}/references/ and {baseDir}/workflows/.
Essential Principles
-
Database quality is non-negotiable. A database that builds is not automatically good. Always run quality assessment (file counts, baseline LoC, extractor errors) and compare against expected source files. A cached build produces zero useful extraction.
-
Data extensions catch what CodeQL misses. Even projects using standard frameworks (Django, Spring, Express) have custom wrappers around database calls, request parsing, or shell execution. Skipping the create-data-extensions workflow means missing vulnerabilities in project-specific code paths.
-
Explicit suite references prevent silent query dropping. Never pass pack names directly to
codeql database analyze— each pack'sdefaultSuiteFileapplies hidden filters that can produce zero results. Always generate a custom.qlssuite file. -
Zero findings needs investigation, not celebration. Zero results can indicate poor database quality, missing models, wrong query packs, or silent suite filtering. Investigate before reporting clean.
-
macOS Apple Silicon requires workarounds for compiled languages. Exit code 137 is
arm64e/arm64mismatch, not a build failure. Try Homebrew arm64 tools or Rosetta before falling back tobuild-mode=none. -
Follow workflows step by step. Once a workflow is selected, execute it step by step without skipping phases. Each phase gates the next — skipping quality assessment or data extensions leads to incomplete analysis.
Output Directory
All generated files (database, build logs, diagnostics, extensions, results) are stored in a single output directory.
- If the user specifies an output directory in their prompt, use it as
OUTPUT_DIR. - If not specified, default to
./static_analysis_codeql_1. If that already exists, increment to_2,_3, etc.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/build-fixes.md 2.6 KB
- references/diagnostic-query-templates.md 9.8 KB
- references/extension-yaml-format.md 7.7 KB
- references/important-only-suite.md 5.6 KB
- references/language-details.md 5.0 KB
- references/macos-arm64e-workaround.md 6.7 KB
- references/performance-tuning.md 3.3 KB
- references/quality-assessment.md 6.8 KB
- references/ruleset-catalog.md 1.8 KB
- references/run-all-suite.md 3.4 KB
- references/sarif-processing.md 3.0 KB
- references/threat-models.md 3.0 KB
- workflows/build-database.md 9.4 KB
- workflows/create-data-extensions.md 9.7 KB
- workflows/run-analysis.md 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 282 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A a4c5b6f128fc
codeql is a skill published in the GitHub repository vigolium/piolium (140 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 3,553 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to codeql, differing in 24 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…