Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vigolium/piolium --skill wooyun-legacygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vigolium/pioliumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/wooyun-legacy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/wooyun-legacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigolium/piolium/wooyun-legacy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigolium/piolium/wooyun-legacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigolium/piolium/wooyun-legacy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.03273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00655 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00327 |
Grade B, and why
wooyun-legacy scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential filesmediumPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
Target files (Linux): `/etc/passwd`, `/etc/shadow`, Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 368 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WooYun Vulnerability Analysis Knowledge Base
Methodology and testing patterns extracted from 88,636 real-world vulnerability cases reported to the WooYun platform (2010-2016).
When to Use
All testing described here must be performed only against systems you have written authorization to test.
- Penetration testing web applications
- Security code review (server-side or client-side)
- Vulnerability research against web targets you have explicit authorization to test
- Building security test cases or checklists
- Assessing web application attack surface
- Reviewing remediation effectiveness
- Training or education in authorized security testing contexts
When NOT to Use
- Network infrastructure testing (firewalls, routers, switches)
- Mobile application binary analysis
- Malware analysis or reverse engineering
- Compliance-only assessments (PCI-DSS, SOC2 checklists without testing)
- Physical security assessments
- Social engineering campaigns
- Cloud infrastructure misconfigurations (IAM, S3 buckets) — these require cloud-specific tooling, not web vuln patterns
Rationalizations to Reject
These shortcuts lead to missed findings. Reject them:
- "The WAF will catch it" — WAFs are bypass-able; test the application logic, not the middleware
- "It's an internal app, so auth doesn't matter" — internal apps get compromised via SSRF, lateral movement, and credential reuse
- "We already use parameterized queries everywhere" — check for ORM misuse, stored procedures with dynamic SQL, and second-order injection
- "The framework handles XSS" — template engines have raw output modes, JavaScript contexts bypass HTML encoding, and DOM XSS lives entirely client-side
- "File uploads are safe because we check the extension" — extension checks are bypassed via null bytes, double extensions, parser discrepancies, and race conditions
- "We validate on the frontend" — client-side validation is a UX feature, not a security control
- "Nobody would guess that URL" — security through obscurity fails against directory bruteforcing, referrer leaks, and JS source analysis
- "Low severity, not worth reporting" — low-severity findings chain into critical attack paths
What ships with it
21 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/bank-penetration.md 8.9 KB
- references/checklists/command-execution-checklist.md 3.4 KB
- references/checklists/csrf-checklist.md 2.9 KB
- references/checklists/file-upload-checklist.md 3.6 KB
- references/checklists/info-disclosure-checklist.md 3.5 KB
- references/checklists/logic-flaws-checklist.md 3.6 KB
- references/checklists/misconfig-checklist.md 3.9 KB
- references/checklists/path-traversal-checklist.md 3.1 KB
- references/checklists/rce-checklist.md 3.1 KB
- references/checklists/sql-injection-checklist.md 3.1 KB
- references/checklists/ssrf-checklist.md 3.6 KB
- references/checklists/unauthorized-access-checklist.md 3.4 KB
- references/checklists/weak-password-checklist.md 3.9 KB
- references/checklists/xss-checklist.md 3.8 KB
- references/checklists/xxe-checklist.md 4.3 KB
- references/info-disclosure.md 27 KB
- references/logic-flaws.md 21 KB
- references/path-traversal.md 31 KB
- references/telecom-penetration.md 5.2 KB
- references/unauthorized-access.md 28 KB
- references/xss.md 19 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 368 lines · 80 tokens per session scan B 381b74bb3408
wooyun-legacy is a skill published in the GitHub repository vigolium/piolium (133 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 3,273 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reaches for credential files). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.