Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/plugin install odoo-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-content-draft)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-content-draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-content-draft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-content-draft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-content-draft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01028 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
odoo-content-draft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
Front door for one piece of marketing content about Odoo or a custom distribution: a blog
article, a LinkedIn post, a YouTube script, an email sequence, landing-page copy blocks or a
social caption. Audience: the buying committee of the brief's BUYER PROFILE, or the one the
writer builds. It resolves the facts, settles what the request leaves open, and launches ONE
odoo-marketer in MODE: copy, which verifies every claim and searches earlier drafts before it
writes.
Out of Scope
- Multi-channel campaign orchestration (strategy, budget, timeline) ->
odoo-campaign-plan - Competitive positioning vs. major competitors (SAP, Microsoft, regional vendors) ->
odoo-competitive-brief - Feature highlight decks for sales slides ->
odoo-feature-highlights - Gap analysis / proposal text for a prospect ->
odoo-gap-analysis - Handling objections during a sales conversation ->
odoo-objection-handling - A module's App Store page with live screenshots and manifest images ->
odoo-doc-illustration
MCP tools
Optional - use only when grounding a specific feature claim:
check_module_exists- Verify that a named Odoo/Viindoo module actually exists before citing it in content. Call when user names a specific module (e.g., "mrp", "helpdesk") and you want to confirm edition (CE/EE/Viindoo) and version presence.find_examples- Fetch 1-2 real code or config snippets from the indexed Odoo codebase for technical credibility (e.g., a field name, a workflow state). Use sparingly; content audiences rarely need raw code.
NOT required for most drafts. Skip both if:
- The topic is generic (ERP benefits, SME pain points, productivity tips)
- OSM is unreachable (see Standalone-first fallback section)
- User has already provided feature details verbally
Steps
- Resolve project facts per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/project-facts-resolution.mdbefore asking for any project fact; captureSHARE_DIRandISOLATE_DIRonce (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/state-root-resolution.md). The audience (BUYER PROFILEor a named audience), messaging pillars, channel restrictions and tone come from the caller's brief or the request; whatever they state overrides any default. - Clarify once. Confirm only what is still missing: channel, topic or product angle,
audience, output language, tone, and - for landing-page copy whose brief has no
TARGET MARKET- the target market, proposed perreferences/buyer-profile.md§ Target market. More than one unclear: ONE compound question. Clear enough: launch at once and offer to adjust; a target market is never assumed. - Launch
odoo-marketerwithMODE: copyand the brief ofreferences/marketer-brief.md,modelper${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/concurrency-guard.md§ Model-tier selection (composing is sonnet, landing-page copy is opus; re-cutting an existing draft to another channel is haiku). A revision the user asks for goes to the same agent withSendMessage, never a new launch. - Return the draft as the agent wrote it (channel-native format, the
## Buyer profileblock first when it built one, every<TBD: ...>kept visible), its saved path, and the agent'sconcerns. A draft that carries[Image: ...]placeholders returnsNEEDS_NEXT->odoo-doc-illustration.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed 06a81470b1f4
- 17d ago Changed · -60 lines · +1 tokens per session e61bcb53a5cc
- 20d ago Changed · -9 lines e70584dcf0e1
- 21d ago Changed 847ed9c1ffc9
- 24d ago Changed 8451eee31fa6
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 1a359322e629
- 1mo ago Changed · -13 lines · -214 tokens per session 6bf0b04c92ef
- 2mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 237 tokens per session scan A d22f6224c7f2
odoo-content-draft is a skill published in the GitHub repository Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client (9 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,028 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
odoo-content-draft compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| odoo-content-draftViindoo/odoo-mcp-client | Skill | 9 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 315k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |