Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/plugin install odoo-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00234 | $0.02516 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00117 | $0.01258 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00503 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00252 |
Grade C, and why
odoo-ui-review scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
`find <ISOLATE_DIR>/visual/screenshots/ -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d -mmin +43200 -exec rm -rf {} +` How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
UI/UX reviewer for rendered Odoo screens. Judges the running interface - what a user sees and clicks - across six lenses: aesthetics, functional correctness, stability, accessibility, performance, and design-system fidelity (does the screen match the Odoo design system and the project mockup, or is it off-theme?). Evidence-based: every finding cites a screenshot, a console message, a Lighthouse score, a computed-style readout, or a snapshot node - never an unverified impression.
Out of Scope
- Investigating WHY a screen is broken / errors / blank render →
odoo-debug - Comparing two states or builds for visual drift / regression →
odoo-visual-regression - Executing a full workflow / QA-ing the affected cluster across roles with a PASS/FAIL verdict →
odoo-acceptance(this skill rates how ONE rendered screen looks/behaves; it does not drive CRUD/role flows or adjudicate an acceptance oracle) - Recording a demo or marketing walkthrough video →
odoo-demo-recording - Writing or changing Odoo frontend JS/OWL source →
odoo-coding - Source-level code review (Python/JS/XML) →
odoo-code-review
When to invoke
Main agent launches the odoo-ui-reviewer agent as a subagent when the user has a running
Odoo instance and wants a verdict on how a rendered screen looks and behaves. The agent drives a
live browser (chrome-devtools MCP) to capture the screen, exercise controls, run a Lighthouse
audit, sweep responsive breakpoints, then ground every styling defect in the codebase via OSM. It
runs as an autonomous agent (not inline) because the review needs many sequential+parallel
browser/MCP round-trips.
Brief context - Odoo UI review pitfalls
Key things the agent watches for:
- Selector era by version - v17+ backend uses
/odoowith.o_form_view/.o_list_view/.o_kanban_view; older versions use/web. Pin the version before navigating. - Login first - Odoo screens are session-gated; the agent logs in before capturing.
- Six-lens coverage - a finding in one lens (e.g. a console error) often explains a defect in another (a control that silently fails); cross-reference them.
- Source-grounded fixes - a styling defect is only actionable once the owning module/stylesheet is named, so the fix lands in the right place rather than as an inline override.
- Design-system / theme lens - run a token-reality check per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/odoo-frontend-fidelity.md: readgetComputedStyleon:root+ representative elements and flag empty/transparent surfaces, self-referential CSS custom properties,--bs-*references (Odoo sets$variable-prefix:'', so Bootstrap--bs-*runtime vars are absent across v16+ confirmed through v19 - reference--primary/--o-color-*instead), hardcoded palette, and divergence from the mockup. Emit remediation as a token+file pointer, not an inline patch.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 147 lines · 234 tokens per session scan C f869a3e76dea
odoo-ui-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client (7 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 234 tokens to every session and 2,516 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.