Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/plugin install odoo-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/run-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/run-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/run-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/run-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/run-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.07855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.03927 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01571 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00785 |
Grade A, and why
run-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 451 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
run-harness - Drive-to-done loop
Role
Conductor of a multi-step run. Owns no domain expertise: reads the blackboard, decides the next step,
dispatches it, records the result. Prompt-discipline plus advisory hook nudges - NOT a hard scheduler
(never trap the main agent). Mechanism SSOT: docs/reference/workflow-harness.md §8 - this file is
the operating procedure, that is the contract.
Out of Scope
- Authoring business artifacts → dispatches the specialist; only writes
run-<id>.json. - Planning / serializing the DAG → intake's Phase P. The driver only walks an EXISTING
run-<id>.json; it never ingests a plan.md. A plan-producing skill (e.g.odoo-planning) routes it to intake Phase P (next: odoo-intake), NEVERnext: run-harnesswith only a plan pointer - reaching this loop before serialization yieldsNEEDS_CONTEXT. - Coercing the main agent → advisory nudges only (Hard rule #2).
- Crossing the Odoo↔general boundary → intake's routing decision.
Hard rules
- Owns the blackboard. This is the orchestrator that walks the RUN-DAG; it owns the run state and controls dispatch, so it MUST NOT be invoked from inside a subagent.
- Never hard-block the main agent - but that is not an open license to pause. This loop is
prompt-discipline, not coercion: the Stop/PreToolUse hooks only nudge (advisory); they never
deny a tool call or block a turn-end (quality-gate
blockis only ever for a subagent). That does NOT make "a node just finished" a reason to stop. The main agent auto-advances the run WITHOUT asking a human UNLESS one of the following ENUMERATED conditions holds - these are the ONLY legitimate reasons to end the turn and await a human "continue": (a) the node is L2 (§ Gate-tier resolution below - ALWAYS a human gate); (b) the run resolves to BLOCKED for ANY reason (§ Circuit-breakers below and every "STOP BLOCKED" in this file - examples, not a closed set); (c) NEEDS_CONTEXT; (d) the human issued an explicit stop/abort phrase (§ Circuit-breakers). Finishing a node, or any single subagent dispatch, is by itself never one of these - and a run that plows past a genuine (a)-(d) condition instead of stopping is BLOCKED behavior too (a real blocker ignored), not drive-to-done. (a)-(d) are the reasons to end a turn AWAITING A HUMAN; ending one to RECEIVE a dispatched agent's report is neither - that stop needs no human: the launch is asynchronous, so stopping is the ONLY point a result can reach you (§ The loop >dispatch), and the run resumes on the child's own completion. - Writes to
run-<id>.jsonafter creation are run-harness's alone. Intake's Phase P performs the one-time bootstrap write; from then only this loop writes it (hooks never write it - no race). - You dispatch; subagents do not. A step emits a Continuation Contract (a signal); acting
on its
next[]is THIS loop's job. Respect the worker-brief contract (snippets/worker-brief.md). - L2 is always a human gate. The autonomy dial can lower L1→auto-pass but NEVER L2
(irreversible/outward: shared instance, git MERGE to the principal branch, send to a third party).
The merge is the ONLY OUTWARD L2 (owned by
odoo-pr-monitoring) - not the only L2 a run hits: the REGISTRY also returns L2 for an instance-touching skill (odoo-i18n,odoo-acceptance), and the ephemeral ceiling lowers exactly the nodes THIS driver briefed against a throwaway database. No local merge into the principal checkout; no auto-merge. EVERY node's tier,integrateincluded, comes from the ONE total function in § Gate-tier resolution, never from a prose exception. - Worktree-always for SOURCE-writing dispatch (realizes intake Hard Rule 6). Before dispatching
a node that writes the SOURCE tree (not the
$ODOO_AI_HOMEstate root; same test as Gate-tier resolution), if it has noWORKTREE_PATH/TARGET: worktree:<path>and its approach is not a self-provisioning specialist (SSOT list:${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/git-delegation.md§ Self-provisioning specialists), INVOKEgit-toolkit:git-opsfor a dedicated worktree/branch, inject its path into the node'sinputs, andwrite(RUN). NEVER dispatch a source-writing node against the principal checkout. A node writing only under the$ODOO_AI_HOMEstate root (e.g.odoo-code-reviewatTARGET=local) is NOT provisioned.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 451 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A 402143cfbf34
run-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 7,855 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…