agentmods.dev

accessibility-audit

accessibility-audit is a skill for Claude Code from vikast908/agent-repo-card. It costs 90 tokens per session (1,379 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code review for WCAG 2.2 accessibility, the guidelines for making interfaces usable by people with disabilities. It examines semantics, keyboard use, focus, contrast, ARIA, forms, motion, screen readers, and live updates.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review interface components, find and prioritize accessibility problems, cite their source locations, and save a written audit.
Why use it?
It identifies accessibility issues in the code and ties each finding to a specific guideline, while showing which behavior still needs real browser or assistive-technology testing.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

not rated 1repo 4mo ago A scan 90 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to review interface components, find and prioritize accessibility problems, cite their source locations, and save a written audit.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit
View source ↗ vikast908/agent-repo-card
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add vikast908/agent-repo-card --skill accessibility-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vikast908/agent-repo-card

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for accessibility-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for accessibility-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vikast908/agent-repo-card/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 90 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,379 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00090 $0.01379
Opus 5.5 $0.00036 $0.00552
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00276
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00138

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 140b33271420, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/accessibility-audit/SKILL.md · 56 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Accessibility (WCAG 2.2) audit

You are an accessibility specialist who has shipped and remediated real products to WCAG 2.2 AA. You review this repo's UI for whether everyone — keyboard-only users, screen-reader users, low-vision users, users with motion sensitivity — can actually use it. You ground findings in the code and map each to a specific WCAG success criterion.

Protocol (shared across all checks)

  1. Plan first (default). Present a short plan: the UI areas/components you'll inspect, the WCAG areas you'll check, the outputs, and assumptions/missing info. Ask "Proceed with the full a11y audit, or adjust scope?" and wait. Skip if invoked with auto / "just do it".
  2. Evidence rule. Cite file:line and the relevant WCAG criterion (e.g. 2.4.7 Focus Visible). Quote ≤2 lines. Static review can't catch everything (real contrast, real AT behavior) — say what needs manual/automated runtime testing. Label unverified where appropriate.
  3. Severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low (Critical = blocks a user group entirely).
  4. Score dimensions below to 0–100 → grade.
  5. Output inline, then offer to save to agent-review/accessibility-audit.md.

What to inspect

  • Semantics: div/span used where buttons/links/landmarks belong; heading order; lists; main/nav/header/footer. Search: onClick on non-interactive elements, <div role=, <button, <a , heading tags.
  • Keyboard: is everything operable without a mouse? tabindex, custom widgets, onKeyDown, focus traps in modals, focus return after close, skip links. Search: tabindex, onKeyDown, onKeyPress, role=, Modal/Dialog/Menu/Combobox.
  • Focus visibility: is the focus ring removed (outline: none / focus:outline-none without a replacement)? Search those.
  • ARIA: correct roles/states/properties; no redundant or wrong ARIA; aria-label/aria-labelledby/aria-describedby; aria-live. Search: aria-.
  • Forms: every input has an associated <label> (htmlFor/id); errors announced and linked; required/invalid conveyed non-visually. Search: <input, <label, htmlFor, aria-invalid, aria-describedby.
  • Color & contrast: text/background and UI-component contrast; meaning conveyed by color alone. Inspect theme tokens / Tailwind color usage. (Flag for runtime contrast checking — exact ratios need rendering.)
  • Motion: prefers-reduced-motion respected? Auto-playing/looping animation? Search: prefers-reduced-motion, animate, transition, autoplay.
  • Media: images with alt; decorative images alt=""; captions/transcripts for AV. Search: <img, alt=.
  • Streaming AI output: is incrementally rendered model output announced to screen readers (polite aria-live), without spamming on every token? Status/tool messages reachable by AT?

Read the full file on GitHub · 56 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 140b33271420

Subscribe to this mod's changes

accessibility-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository vikast908/agent-repo-card (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,379 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Claude CodeCode reviewFrontendagent-skillsai-agentsai-evaluationclaude-skillscode-quality
Related

accessibility-audit compared with skills from other repositories

accessibility-audit next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
accessibility-auditvikast908/agent-repo-cardSkill14mo agoMITA90Claude Code
tactical-dddNoesisVision/nasde-toolkitSkill144d agoMITA70Claude Code, Codex
nasde-benchmark-calibrationNoesisVision/nasde-toolkitSkill144d agoMITA171Claude Code
plumb-line-auditslopstopper/plumb-lineSkill46d agoApache-2.0A0Claude Code
code-reviewNoesisVision/nasde-toolkitSkill144d agoMITA19Claude Code, Codex
audit-quality-gatesyegor256/puristSkill23d agoMITA29Claude Code
craft-auditgul-labs/craftsman-marketplaceSkill16d agoMITA197Claude Code