Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai --skill refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vikisingh23/neuraforge-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00160 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Break down complex files into focused, testable pieces.
How to use
Point at a file: "Refactor src/services/OrderService.ts"
The agent will:
- Analyze responsibilities (how many things does it do?)
- Plan the split with file names and line estimates
- Generate focused files, update all imports
- Generate missing tests for new files
Rule: Components <150 lines, Services <300 lines.
For full instructions, read agents/refactor.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 8d45ba7c2a93
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai (4 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 160 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
trace
Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone, ends with a final-integration review of the fix. Trigger with /hyperflow:trace, "debug this", "find the root cause", "why…
evidence-audit
Evidence-led audit/fix rounds for any codebase in any language. Finds only defects that a runnable proof reproduces on current code, applies the narrowest in-scope patch, verifies with a second proof, promotes high-risk proofs to permanent regression tests, and reports exact validation results. Use whenever the user…
debugging
Use this skill when something is broken and the cause is unknown — a failing test, a crash, an error message, wrong output, a regression, a hang, or behaviour that differs between environments — and it has to be found and fixed at the root. Also use it to build the failing proof for a suspected defect before fixing…
extending-hobby-smoke-tests
Design, extend, review, or debug PostHog Hobby end-to-end smoke tests in bin/hobby-ci.py and .github/workflows/ci-hobby.yml. Use when adding an ingestion round trip, deciding whether a product belongs in Hobby CI, changing the CI Hobby service topology or API-key scopes, or diagnosing a smoke test that captures data…