Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit/create-componentnpx skills add viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit --skill create-componentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00825 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
create-component scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Component / Module
Detect Project Structure
!ls -d src/ app/ lib/ pkg/ cmd/ internal/ components/ pages/ modules/ features/ 2>/dev/null
!ls package.json go.mod Cargo.toml pyproject.toml *.csproj Gemfile mix.exs 2>/dev/null
Existing Components (for pattern matching)
!find . -type d -maxdepth 4 \( -path "*/components/*" -o -path "*/modules/*" -o -path "*/features/*" -o -path "*/pkg/*" -o -path "*/internal/*" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" 2>/dev/null | head -20
Scaffolding Process
Step 1: Analyze Existing Patterns
- Find the most similar existing component/module
- Note its file structure:
- Main implementation file
- Test file
- Types/interfaces file
- Index/barrel file
- Styles file (if frontend)
- Storybook/docs file (if applicable)
- Note naming conventions:
- PascalCase, camelCase, kebab-case, or snake_case?
- File extensions (.tsx, .ts, .py, .go, etc.)
- Test file suffix (.test.ts, test.go, test.py, _spec.rb, etc.)
Step 2: Determine What to Generate
Based on the detected framework:
React/Next.js/Vue:
ComponentName/
├── ComponentName.tsx # Main component
├── ComponentName.test.tsx # Tests
├── ComponentName.types.ts # TypeScript interfaces
├── ComponentName.module.css # Styles (if CSS modules used)
└── index.ts # Barrel export
Python:
module_name/
├── __init__.py # Public exports
├── module_name.py # Main implementation
├── models.py # Data models (if applicable)
└── test_module_name.py # Tests
Go:
packagename/
├── packagename.go # Main implementation
├── packagename_test.go # Tests
└── types.go # Type definitions (if needed)
Rust:
module_name/
├── mod.rs # Module entry point
├── types.rs # Types and structs
└── tests.rs # Tests
C#/.NET:
ModuleName/
├── ModuleName.cs # Main class
├── IModuleName.cs # Interface
└── ModuleNameTests.cs # Tests
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 102 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 26a126a98bd2
create-component is a skill published in the GitHub repository viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 825 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
interview
Ask one useful structured question at a time only when material product/implementation choices are genuinely missing; remember answers and produce a brief/spec. Discoverable facts should be investigated instead of asked.
security-review
Review trust boundaries, auth/authz, injection, secrets, filesystem/network exposure, dependencies, and exploitability without pretending a shallow lint is an audit.
ppt-review
Read this skill only after current officereview structural output and relevant rendered images exist. Do not use source code, a tool success flag, or the first-slide preview as a substitute for deck evidence.
ui-design-contract
Use this skill before rendering when the direction must persist across multiple screens/components, brand or system work, conflicting references, formal handoff, or a genuinely vague visual system. Ordinary single-screen screenshots and clear briefs use ui-design-executor's compact source/visual thesis instead of…
helmor-debug-operate
Operate, reproduce, and debug a running local Helmor desktop development build through the Tauri MCP bridge. Use when the user asks to use Tauri MCP, towery MCP, the local dev build, the Tauri webview, visual end-to-end validation, UI automation, screenshots, DOM/accessibility snapshots, IPC or log tracing…