Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Vimalk0703/shipworthy --skill brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vimalk0703/shipworthyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/brainstorming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/brainstorming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/brainstorming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01804 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00722 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00361 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorming
Task Size Classification
Before doing anything, classify the task:
| Size | Examples | Signal Words |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Fix | Add a health endpoint, fix a typo, change button color, update copy, add an env var, tweak spacing | "add", "fix", "change", "update", "tweak", "rename" on a single small concern |
| Feature | Build user authentication, add Stripe payments, create a dashboard page, implement file upload | "build", "create", "implement", "add" for a user-facing capability |
| Project | Design a microservice architecture, rebuild the data layer, migrate databases, redesign the app | "design", "architect", "rebuild", "migrate", "redesign" spanning multiple systems |
When in doubt, start small. You can always escalate if complexity reveals itself.
User Tier Detection
- Builder tier: Non-technical or semi-technical user. Wants things built. Dislikes process talk. Cares about outcomes, not methodology. Signs: asks "can you build X", doesn't mention tech stack specifics, uses product language not engineering language.
- Engineer tier: Technical user. Appreciates rigor. Wants to understand tradeoffs. Signs: mentions specific technologies, asks about architecture, uses engineering terminology, requests design docs.
If uncertain, default to Builder tier. Nobody ever complained that you moved too fast; plenty have complained about being lectured on process.
Lite Mode
Use when: Quick Fix tasks (any tier) OR Feature tasks with Builder-tier users.
Collapses the full process into 3 steps. Fast, focused, no ceremony.
Step 1: Understand
- What needs to happen?
- Who is this for?
- Any constraints? (existing code patterns, architecture.md rules, performance needs)
- Read relevant existing code quickly to avoid breaking things
Step 2: Recommend
- Propose ONE approach. Not three. One.
- Briefly explain why this is the right call
- For Builder-tier: "Here's what I'll do" not "Here are your options"
- For Quick Fixes: this step can be a single sentence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 44dc892ab847
brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vimalk0703/shipworthy (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,804 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
bmad-ux
Capture the user's UX vision in two documents: DESIGN.md for how the product looks and EXPERIENCE.md for how it behaves. Use when the user says "lets create UX design" or "create UX specifications" or "help me plan the UX".
ux-review
Validate a UX spec, HUD design or pattern library — accessibility, GDD alignment, readiness. APPROVED / NOT ASSESSED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED.
team-ui
Orchestrate the UI team through the UX pipeline — authoring, visual design, implementation, review, polish. Uses /ux-design, /ux-review, studio templates.
gsap
Expert guidelines for building high-performance animations with GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform).
brand-identity
Brand strategy and identity design for businesses and products. Use when creating brand guidelines, developing visual identity systems, or defining brand positioning.
graphic-design
Professional graphic design principles for digital and print media. Use when creating visual designs, choosing color palettes, typography, layouts, or providing design feedback.