Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vimalk0703/shipworthynpx agentmods add skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/response-schema-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01616 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00646 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
response-schema-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Response Schema Validation
Core Rule
Every API response must be validated against a declared schema before it leaves the server. Returning raw database objects or unvalidated data is a data leakage vector and a contract violation.
Why This Matters
| Risk | What Happens Without Schema Validation |
|---|---|
| Data leakage | Internal fields (password_hash, internal_notes, admin_flag) accidentally returned to clients |
| Contract drift | Frontend expects { user_id } but backend returns { userId } after a refactor — no error, silent failure |
| Over-fetching | Entire database rows returned when the client needs 3 fields — bandwidth waste and attack surface expansion |
| Type mismatches | null where a string is expected, number-as-string, missing required fields — client crashes |
Implementation Patterns
TypeScript (Zod)
Define response schemas alongside request schemas. Validate before sending:
// BAD — returning raw database row (leaks internal fields)
app.get('/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await db.users.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(user); // exposes passwordHash, internalNotes, loginAttempts
});
// GOOD — validate through a declared response schema
// schemas/user.ts
import { z } from 'zod';
export const UserResponse = z.object({
id: z.string().uuid(),
name: z.string(),
email: z.string().email(),
role: z.enum(['user', 'admin']),
createdAt: z.string().datetime(),
});
// NEVER include: passwordHash, internalNotes, loginAttempts
export type UserResponse = z.infer<typeof UserResponse>;
// routes/users.ts
import { UserResponse } from '../schemas/user';
app.get('/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await db.users.findById(req.params.id);
if (!user) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Not found' });
// Validate and strip — only declared fields pass through
const response = UserResponse.parse(user);
res.json(response);
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 3689a3682922
response-schema-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vimalk0703/shipworthy (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,616 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-rails-api
Padrões DARE para APIs em Ruby on Rails 8 — API mode, ActiveRecord, Solid Queue, Solid Cable, Action Cable, strong parameters, services (interactors), serializers (Blueprinter/Alba), Devise/JWT, rack-attack, rswag/grape-swagger.
dare-laravel-api
Padrões DARE para APIs REST em Laravel 11 + PHP 8.3 — Strict Types, FormRequests, Services, JsonResources, Eloquent + casts, tratamento global de exceções, testes Feature/Pest, PHPStan/Larastan, Pint.
dare-realtime
Comunicação real-time (WebSocket, SSE) em projetos DARE. Fornece schema validation de eventos, registro central de tipos, reconexão com exponential backoff, e gerenciamento de subscriptions com limpeza garantida (zero ghost listeners).
dare-rust-workspace
Decisão e migração de Cargo workspace multi-crate para projetos Rust/Axum. Use durante design/blueprint para decidir o layout, ou quando um projeto single-crate cresceu além do que comporta confortavelmente. Cobre os 2 cenários — escolher na fase de design + migrar projeto existente — com critérios objetivos e plano…
skill-fastapi-api
Padrões DARE para APIs REST em Python + FastAPI + Pydantic + uvicorn. Routers, dependency injection, Pydantic v2 schemas, async SQLAlchemy 2.0, autenticação OAuth2 + JWT, rate limit com slowapi, pytest + httpx, OpenAPI auto-gerado.
skill-go-gin-api
Padrões DARE para APIs REST em Go + Gin (ou stdlib net/http) + sqlc + PostgreSQL. Handlers, services, repositories, middleware, validação com go-playground/validator, JWT, rate limit, swag (OpenAPI), testes com testify e httptest.