Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Vimalk0703/shipworthy --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vimalk0703/shipworthyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vimalk0703/shipworthy/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Purpose
Transform an approved design into a sequence of small, verifiable tasks that follow TDD discipline.
Plan Structure
Save plans to .shipworthy/plans/[feature-name].md.
Header
# Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]
**Design Spec**: [link to spec]
**Architecture Constraints**: [relevant Mandatory Rules from architecture.md]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
File Map
Before defining tasks, list every file that will be created or modified:
## File Map
- `src/services/user-service.ts` — NEW: user service logic
- `src/routes/users.ts` — MODIFY: add new endpoints
- `src/types/user.ts` — MODIFY: add new types
- `tests/services/user-service.test.ts` — NEW: service tests
Tasks
Each task follows TDD flow and takes 2-5 minutes:
## Task 1: [Descriptive Name]
**Files**: [exact paths]
**Test first**: [the test to write, with actual code — not pseudocode]
**Implementation**: [the code to write — actual code, not descriptions]
**Verification**: [command to run: `npm test`, `npm run build`, etc.]
**Quality gate**: [what proves this task is done]
Rules for Tasks
- Zero placeholders — every task has actual code, not "implement the logic here"
- 2-5 minutes each — if a task takes longer, break it down further
- TDD flow — test first, then implementation, then verification
- One responsibility — each file should have one clear purpose (SOLID)
- Atomic commits — each task should be committable independently
- Consistent naming — type/method names must be consistent across ALL tasks
- Architecture compliance — every task must reference which architecture rules it satisfies
Security & Performance Sections
## Security Considerations
- [What input validation is needed?]
- [What authentication/authorization applies?]
- [Any sensitive data handling?]
## Performance Impact
- [New database queries introduced?]
- [Bundle size impact?]
- [API response time expectations?]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 330cb800d485
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vimalk0703/shipworthy (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,180 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dare-execute
Executa uma task específica com implementação de código e testes. Use quando o usuário aprovar TASKS.md e quiser executar uma task. Implementa o código, roda testes (Ralph Loop) e valida até passar.
plan-pipeline-execute
Execute a validated plan: worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, level-based parallel agents, quality gate with smoke test, PR creation and merge. Handles everything through to merged PR.
agent-test-generator
Specialist subagent: Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use only when the user explicitly asks for tests, improved coverage, or test-first development.
python-testing
Expert in Python testing with pytest and test-driven development.
testing-strategy
Design test strategies and test plans with coverage targets. Complements /draft:coverage which measures what this skill plans. Auto-loaded by /draft:implement before TDD.
atomic-tdd
Test-first discipline. Auto-triggers on "let's implement X", "add feature Y", "fix bug Z", "write a test for", "implement", "build out", and similar pre-code-change phrases. Iron rule: failing test exists before production code. Skip only for pure docs/config changes with an explicit "skipped because:" note. Explicit…