Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills --skill purview-data-cataloggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills/purview-data-catalog)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills/purview-data-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills/purview-data-catalog/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills/purview-data-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills/purview-data-catalog.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.01874 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00937 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
purview-data-catalog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to purview-data-catalog — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Microsoft Purview Unified Catalog
The Unified Catalog provides business-friendly data discovery and governance on top of the
Data Map: organising assets into governance domains and data products with glossary
terms, ownership, and data quality. This skill is the catalog/business layer; the Data
Map (purview-data-map) is the technical scanning layer underneath.
When to use
Use this skill when the user wants analysts and data consumers to find, trust, and request data - not when they want to scan sources (that is the Data Map's job).
Do not use this skill for:
- Scanning lakehouses, databases, SaaS sources (use
purview-data-map) - Sensitivity labels for security/compliance (use
purview-data-classification) - Lifecycle/retention rules (use
purview-data-lifecycle) - AI data discovery (use
purview-dspm-ai)
Pick the right object for the job
| If you want to... | Object | Owned by |
|---|---|---|
| Define a business area with accountability (Finance, HR, Supply Chain) | Governance domain | Domain owner (business) |
| Bundle related assets into something an analyst can request and consume | Data product | Data product owner (business) |
| Give a business term a shared definition tied to data assets | Glossary term | Domain steward |
| Measure trustworthiness of a critical data element | Data quality rule + score | Data steward |
| Show how a column flows from source to report | Lineage (auto, from Data Map scans) | System-generated |
| Grant a consumer access to a data product | Access policy / request workflow | Data product owner |
Rule of thumb: start with 1-2 governance domains and 5-10 data products. A catalog with 200 thinly-curated products is less useful than one with 10 great ones. Curation depth beats catalog breadth, every time.
Approach
A catalog rollout dies when IT "loads everything" without business ownership. Follow the order; each step gates the next.
- Pre-requisite: Data Map is scanning and producing technical metadata — The Unified Catalog sits on top of the Data Map. Confirm scans are running, lineage is populating, and classifications are firing before designing domains. Verify: Data Map shows scanned assets with classifications (e.g. "Credit Card Number") and at least one lineage link source → sink.
- Pick the right governance domains — Start with 2-3 high-pain business areas, not the org chart. Good first picks: Finance (regulatory pressure), Customer (consent and CRM sprawl), HR (privacy). Each domain needs a named business owner who has time, not a delegated IT proxy. Verify: each domain has a named accountable owner from the business side with a recurring 30-min weekly slot for curation.
- Publish 3-5 data products per domain — A data product groups related assets for a specific consumer use case (e.g. "Customer 360 for marketing analysts"). Each product has: description, glossary terms linked, owner, access guidance, and at least one data quality rule on a key column. Do not publish empty shells. Verify: a representative consumer can find the product, understand what is in it, and request access via the in-portal workflow without external help.
- Build the glossary in parallel, not first — Building a 500-term glossary up front produces a graveyard of terms with no asset links. Define terms as you build products; each term must link to at least one data product or asset at publication. Verify: every published glossary term is linked to ≥1 data asset.
- Assign stewardship with named individuals, not teams — "Owned by the data team" = owned by nobody. Each governance domain and data product has a single named steward. Stewardship workload should be < 4 hours/week per steward, or it stops happening.
- Configure data quality on critical data elements only — Do not scan everything. Pick 5-10 critical data elements per data product (e.g. customer_id, order_amount, date_of_birth) and define rules: completeness, uniqueness, validity, freshness. Publish the score on the product page. Verify: each high-priority data product shows a quality score and the rules behind it.
- Drive adoption with discoverability — Wire the catalog into Power BI (catalog endorsement surfaces in the BI service), Microsoft Search, and Teams. If consumers cannot find products where they already work, they will not use the catalog. Verify: a Power BI dataset surfaces its catalog endorsement; a Teams search returns a linked data product.
- Operate as a continuous programme — Monthly: review unowned assets, stale products, broken lineage. Quarterly: domain owner check-in on curation completeness. Annually: sunset retired products.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 131 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A ba5b9503a5fa
purview-data-catalog is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills (173 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,874 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to purview-data-catalog, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-setup-info-local
Comprehensive setup steps to help the user create complete project structures in a VS Code workspace; this tool is designed for full project initialization and scaffolding, not for creating individual files. When to use this tool: user wants to create a new complete project from scratch; setting up entire project…
project-setup-info-context7
Comprehensive setup steps to help the user create complete project structures in a VS Code workspace. This tool is designed for full project initialization and scaffolding, not for creating individual files. When to use this tool: when the user wants to create a new complete project from scratch; when setting up…
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
sdd-tasks
Break an SDD change into implementation tasks. Trigger: orchestrator launches task planning for a change.
flow-parallel
Decompose and execute large changes, migrations, or multi-issue fixes in parallel with quality gates.
skill-task-management
Manage tasks with Claude Code native tools — use to track TODOs, delegate work, and monitor progress.