Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vincentkoc/dotskills --skill openclaw-pr-batch-sweepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vincentkoc/dotskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vincentkoc/dotskills/openclaw-pr-batch-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vincentkoc/dotskills/openclaw-pr-batch-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vincentkoc/dotskills/openclaw-pr-batch-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vincentkoc/dotskills/openclaw-pr-batch-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vincentkoc/dotskills/openclaw-pr-batch-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.03121 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01561 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00624 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
openclaw-pr-batch-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OpenClaw PR Batch Sweep
Purpose
Drive a continuing queue of real, low-risk OpenClaw contributor bug fixes through qualification, repair, proof, and landing. Work in batches of up to 20 without padding the batch with micro-patches, speculative cleanup, or risky surfaces.
Requires ghx, gitcrawl, gwt, and the OpenClaw maintainer, testing, autoreview, Crabbox, and ClawSweeper skills.
Read references/operator-selection-policy.md before selecting candidates. Read references/worker-contract.md before spawning sub-agents. Read and update references/decision-ledger.json so fresh runs inherit prior landed, rejected, closed, and explicitly skipped PRs.
Compose the repository skills instead of duplicating them:
$openclaw-pr-maintainerfor live GitHub evidence and mutations.$openclaw-landable-bug-sweepfor proof, repair, and landing.$gitcrawlfor discovery and duplicate clusters.$openclaw-testing,$crabbox, and$autoreviewfor validation.$clawsweeperfor readiness labels and exact-head review evidence.
When to use
- The operator says
next 20,continue the PR sweep, or asks for another batch. - The operator wants contributor PRs reproduced, narrowed, repaired, tested, and landed.
- The queue must exclude drafts, maintainer-owned work, UI, security, SSRF, auth, config migrations, and high-risk changes.
- Prior accept/reject decisions should shape future candidate selection.
- Reuse a small retained worker pool so review scales without accumulating completed workers or creating noisy local process pressure.
Workflow
- Recover and continue the existing queue.
- Read recent thread state and the batch ledger.
- Read
auditWatermarkwhen present. UseopenPrThroughas the default floor for newly created PR discovery instead of rehydrating an unchanged live edge. - The watermark is not a terminal decision. An older unhandled PR may re-enter only when its head SHA or risk/readiness state materially changed; terminal ledger entries never re-enter.
- Verify current
main, live PR state, repo instructions,VISION.md, disk, and worktree health. - Keep a handled set containing merged, closed, rejected, ignored, draft, and explicitly skipped PRs.
- Never recycle prior candidates merely because their metadata changed.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 366 B
- assets/icon.jpg 37 KB
- references/decision-ledger.json 159 KB
- references/operator-selection-policy.md 16 KB
- references/worker-contract.md 5.4 KB
- scripts/hydrate-candidates.mjs 6.0 KB runs code
- scripts/hydrate-candidates.test.mjs 6.6 KB runs code
- scripts/rank-candidates.mjs 29 KB runs code
- scripts/rank-candidates.test.mjs 30 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 142 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 6415aea4120f
openclaw-pr-batch-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository vincentkoc/dotskills (102 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 3,121 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
taiyi-integration
A project workflow skill for closing a TaiyiForge change and recording it in a CHANGELOG.md file. It checks review results, tests, and the state of the working tree before archiving the change.
taiyi-review
A pre-merge review guide for checking code changes, design decisions, tests, and documentation. A merge adds reviewed changes to the main code branch.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…