Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vinta/awesome-python --skill preview-verdictsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinta/awesome-pythonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/preview-verdicts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/preview-verdicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinta/awesome-python/preview-verdicts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/preview-verdicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinta/awesome-python/preview-verdicts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
preview-verdicts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +6 lines · +2 tokens per session fdbf48d8aac9
- 4d ago Changed aca1c575667a
- 14d ago Changed · +1 tokens per session 34d93c1ff153
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A cd69d42550f4
preview-verdicts is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinta/awesome-python (327,970 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
coding-standards
Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.
claude-api
Anthropic Claude API patterns for Python and TypeScript. Covers Messages API, streaming, tool use, vision, extended thinking, batches, prompt caching, and Claude Agent SDK. Use when building applications with the Claude API or Anthropic SDKs.
review-work
Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps. Use before merging or to audit delivered work. Invoked as /agiflow:review-work . Uses getworkunit, gettask, updatetask, createtask, createtaskcomment.
cross-model-review
A second-opinion code review that asks a different AI model to independently inspect a change, then compares both reviews. It focuses on logic, security, consistency, and omissions.
ontoly-software-graph
Use Ontoly Software Graph evidence, CLI reports, MCP, and official Ontoly Agent Skills before searching source files when reviewing architecture, dependencies, request flows, configuration, impact, or security-sensitive ownership.
codegraph
A local code-graph query tool for an existing project. It maps symbols and their relationships so you can search for definitions, callers, callees, affected files, and focused context.