Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vivy-yi/finance-skills --skill board-material-distributiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vivy-yi/finance-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/board-material-distribution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/board-material-distribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/board-material-distribution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/board-material-distribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/board-material-distribution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.01988 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
board-material-distribution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
加载上下文
首次使用时： 读取 ../../CLAUDE.md 获取场景级配置（保密级别定义/分发渠道/签收要求）。
/board-material-distribution — Board 材料分发
Examples
→ 示例：用户说"董事会材料要在会议前 5 个工作日发给董事，需要检查材料完整性"，系统应调用本技能，执行分发前完整性检查清单。
→ 示例：用户说"有个董事临时要求加一个议题进 Board Deck，需要重新排版"，系统应调用本技能，更新 Board Deck 并重新生成版本。
→ 示例：用户说"这次 Board Meeting 后需要把会议记录和决议发给相关责任人"，系统应调用本技能，生成会后材料分发清单。
第一步：材料完整性确认
材料清单核对：
□ 须分发的 Board Deck：[✅ 已完成 / ⚠️ 制作中]
□ 其他须分发材料：
| 材料名称 | 份数 | 格式 | 状态 | 备注 |
|---------|------|------|------|------|
| 会议议程 | [X] | [电子/纸质] | [✅/⚠️] | — |
| 上次会议纪要 | [X] | [电子/纸质] | [✅/⚠️] | 须签字 |
| 财务报告 | [X] | [电子/纸质] | [✅/⚠️] | 保密 |
| 决议事项材料 | [X] | [电子/纸质] | [✅/⚠️] | — |
| 外部审计报告 | [X] | [电子/纸质] | [✅/⚠️] | 绝密 |
□ 材料完整性：[✅ 完整 / 🔴 缺失 X 份]
□ 最终版确认：[✅ 已确认 / ⚠️ 待 [姓名] 确认]
第二步：分发版本控制
版本记录：
□ 当前分发版本：v[X]
□ 文档数量：[X] 份 / [X] 页
□ 分发时间戳：[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
□ 分发人：[姓名]
□ 版本变更记录：
| 版本 | 日期 | 变更内容 | 变更人 |
|------|------|---------|--------|
| v1.0 | [日期] | 初版 | [姓名] |
| v1.1 | [日期] | [修改内容] | [姓名] |
变更材料追踪：
□ 是否有更新材料须重新分发：[是/否]
→ 更新内容：[描述]
→ 原收件人：[列表]
→ 重新分发日期：[YYYY-MM-DD]
第三步：分发执行
电子分发（如适用）：
□ 分发方式：加密邮件 / 董秘平台 / 保密邮件系统
□ 加密方式：[PGP/密码保护/平台加密]
□ 密码通知方式：[短信/电话/单独邮件]
□ 收件人列表：
| 董事 | 邮箱 | 材料类型 | 发送时间 | 签收状态 |
|------|------|---------|---------|---------|
| [董事A] | [邮件] | [全套/精简] | [时间] | [✅/⚠️] |
| [董事B] | [邮件] | [全套/精简] | [时间] | [✅/⚠️] |
纸质分发（如适用）：
□ 分发方式：[快递/专人送达]
□ 快递公司：[名称]
□ 快递单号：[单号]
□ 纸质材料清单：
→ Board Deck：[X] 份
→ 财务报告：[X] 份（保密）
→ 决议事项材料：[X] 份
□ 签收记录：
| 董事 | 送达地址 | 签收时间 | 签收人 |
|------|---------|---------|--------|
| [董事A] | [地址] | [时间] | [签名] |
第四步：签收确认追踪
签收状态追踪表：
□ 应分发董事：[X] 人
□ 已确认签收：[X] 人
□ 未签收：[X] 人 — 跟进中
| 董事 | 分发方式 | 分发时间 | 签收时间 | 状态 |
|------|---------|---------|---------|------|
| [董事A] | [电子/纸质] | [时间] | [时间] | ✅ |
| [董事B] | [电子/纸质] | [时间] | — | ⚠️ |
□ 未签收跟进：
→ 跟进时间：[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
→ 跟进方式：[电话/短信/邮件]
→ 未签收原因：[原因]
→ 预计签收：[时间]
第五步：归档管理
材料归档：
□ 最终版材料归档位置：[文件路径/档案编号]
□ 归档时间：[YYYY-MM-DD]
□ 归档人：[姓名]
□ 归档材料清单：
→ 完整 Board Deck（盖章版）
→ 会议议程（最终版）
→ 签收记录（扫描件）
→ 版本变更说明
□ 保存期限：[X] 年（符合公司档案管理要求）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 217 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A b935fa03645d
board-material-distribution is a skill published in the GitHub repository vivy-yi/finance-skills (42 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,988 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dietary-check
Audit a menu for allergen labelling, vegan and halal coverage, and common dietary requirements.
design-policy-management-lifecycle
Use when an organization's internal policies accumulate without a defined process for creating, approving, reviewing, and retiring them — establishing a formal policy lifecycle with an accountable owner, a defined review cadence, and a single authoritative repository, rather than letting policies proliferate as…
jahresbericht-1863-bgb
Jahresbericht des Betreuers an das Betreuungsgericht nach § 1863 BGB (Reform 2023). Pflichtinhalt: Bericht über persönliche Verhältnisse der betreuten Person, Vermögensentwicklung, geplante Maßnahmen. Pflichtbestandteile, Vorlagefrist, Abgrenzung zur Rechnungslegung § 1865 BGB. Use when ein beruflicher Betreuer den…
scope-of-work-generator
Generate a complete real estate engagement scope of work (SOW), listing agreement summary, or service fee proposal. Use this skill whenever a user asks to scope a listing engagement, write a service agreement, explain what's included in the commission, price a custom real estate service, define change-order triggers…
contract-generator
Draft professional legal contracts — NDAs, service agreements, employment contracts, and SaaS terms with customizable clauses.
agency-legal-document-review
Comprehensive legal document review specialist for contracts, litigation documents, and real estate agreements — summarizing documents, flagging risk clauses, comparing contract versions, and checking compliance across any law firm size or practice area.