Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vivy-yi/finance-skills --skill integration-roadmapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vivy-yi/finance-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/integration-roadmap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/integration-roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/integration-roadmap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/integration-roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/integration-roadmap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.02722 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.01089 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00544 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00272 |
Grade A, and why
integration-roadmap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
加载上下文
首次使用时: 读取 ../../CLAUDE.md 获取场景级配置(整合最佳实践/历史整合经验/协同效应基准)。
/integration-roadmap — 并购整合路线图
Examples
→ 示例:用户说"交割后 100 天了,整合进展怎么样,帮我做一次回顾",系统应调用本技能,执行 100 天整合进展回顾。
→ 示例:用户说"帮我们制定一个财务系统整合的路线图,分几步走",系统应调用本技能,制定财务系统整合路线图。
→ 示例:用户说"整合中遇到文化冲突,帮我从财务管控角度设计过渡方案",系统应调用本技能,设计财务管控过渡方案。
第一步:整合范围确认
交易基本信息:
□ 交易名称:[名称]
□ 交易类型:[收购/少数股权/合并/资产剥离]
□ 交割日期:[YYYY-MM-DD]
□ 整合期限:[X] 个月 / [X] 年
□ 交易规模:
→ 交易对价:[X] 万
→ 标的估值:[X] 万
→ 溢价比例:[X]%(vs 净资产 [X] 万)
□ 被收购方基本信息:
→ 业务:[描述]
→ 员工:[X] 人
→ 主要市场:[描述]
整合范围确认:
□ 须整合的领域:
→ 战略与治理:[是/否/待定]
→ 业务运营:[是/否/待定]
→ 财务管理:[是/否/待定]
→ IT 系统:[是/否/待定]
→ 人力资源:[是/否/待定]
→ 市场营销/品牌:[是/否/待定]
□ 不纳入整合的领域:[描述]
□ 整合深度目标:[完全整合/保持独立运营/选择性整合]
第二步:协同效应评估
预期协同效应:
□ 成本协同效应(Cost Synergy):
→ 预期年度节约:[X] 万
→ 来源 1:[描述] — 节约 [X] 万
→ 来源 2:[描述] — 节约 [X] 万
→ 预计实现时间:[Year X]
□ 收入协同效应(Revenue Synergy):
→ 预期年度增量:[X] 万
→ 来源 1:[描述] — 增量 [X] 万
→ 来源 2:[描述] — 增量 [X] 万
→ 预计实现时间:[Year X]
□ 财务协同效应(Financial Synergy):
→ 来源:[税收优化/融资成本降低/资本效率提升]
→ 预期价值:[X] 万
协同效应分解:
| 协同类型 | 年度价值(万) | 实现概率 | 置信度 |
|---------|-------------|---------|--------|
| 成本协同 | [X] | [X]% | [高/中/低] |
| 收入协同 | [X] | [X]% | [高/中/低] |
| 财务协同 | [X] | [X]% | [高/中/低] |
| **合计** | **[X]** | — | — |
第三步:整合计划制定
整合里程碑:
□ Phase 1:稳定期(交割后 [X] 个月)
→ 目标:维持业务连续性,组建整合团队
→ 关键任务:
· 组建整合委员会:[完成日期]
· 完成治理结构过渡:[完成日期]
· 保留关键人员确认:[完成日期]
→ 责任人:[姓名/职位]
□ Phase 2:协同期([X]-[X] 个月)
→ 目标:实现成本协同,推进业务整合
→ 关键任务:
· 供应链整合:[完成日期]
· IT 系统迁移:[完成日期]
· 财务共享整合:[完成日期]
→ 责任人:[姓名/职位]
□ Phase 3:优化期([X]-[X] 个月)
→ 目标:完成全部整合,实现目标协同效应
→ 关键任务:
· 品牌整合:[完成日期]
· 组织架构调整:[完成日期]
· 绩效体系统一:[完成日期]
→ 责任人:[姓名/职位]
关键任务清单:
□ 业务整合:
→ 任务 1:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
→ 任务 2:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
□ 财务整合:
→ 任务 1:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
→ 任务 2:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
□ IT 整合:
→ 任务 1:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
→ 任务 2:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
□ 人员整合:
→ 任务 1:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
→ 任务 2:[描述] — 责任人 [X] — 完成 [日期]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 292 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 90093df888c6
integration-roadmap is a skill published in the GitHub repository vivy-yi/finance-skills (42 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 2,722 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cro-advisor
Revenue leadership for B2B SaaS: forecasting, sales model design, pricing, and net revenue retention. Use when designing the revenue engine, setting quotas, modeling NRR, evaluating pricing, or scaling sales teams.
cre-development
CRE Development and Construction suite - 8 specialist skills for U.S. site/entitlement screening, budget and yield-on-cost, construction loan sizing, GC contracts, draw review, schedule risk, lease-up pro forma, and IC memo writing.
close-management
When the user wants to plan, sequence, or track the month-end or year-end close process. Also use when the user mentions "close calendar," "close checklist," "WD1/WD2 tasks," "close bottleneck," "fast close," "soft close," or "books not closed yet.".
earned-value-mgmt
When the user wants to track the financial progress of a large project. Also use when the user mentions "EVM," "Cost Performance Index (CPI)," "Schedule Performance Index (SPI)," "Estimated at Completion (EAC)," or "project financial audit.".
cost-optimize
Reduce the food cost of a menu to hit a target percentage through ingredient swaps, without sacrificing quality.
reconcile
Reconcile today's fulfilments against the ledger and report any mismatches.