Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vivy-yi/finance-skills --skill strategic-assumptiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vivy-yi/finance-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/strategic-assumption)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/strategic-assumption"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/strategic-assumption/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/strategic-assumption"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/finance-skills/strategic-assumption.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02195 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01097 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00439 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
strategic-assumption scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
加载上下文
首次使用时: 读取 ../../CLAUDE.md 获取场景级配置(战略目标/行业基准/假设追踪规则)。
/strategic-assumption — 战略假设分析
Examples
→ 示例:用户说"我们 2026 年的战略假设是人民币汇率稳定,但现在看可能不对,帮我重新评估",系统应调用本技能,识别假设偏差并更新战略影响分析。
→ 示例:用户说"帮我们梳理一下 3 年战略规划里的核心假设,哪些最容易被推翻",系统应调用本技能,系统性地识别和评估战略假设。
→ 示例:用户说"主要原材料价格大幅波动,帮我评估对战略规划的影响",系统应调用本技能,分析关键假设变化下的战略敏感性。
第一步:战略假设识别
战略规划概览:
□ 战略周期:[X] 年([YYYY] 至 [YYYY])
□ 战略主题:[增长/效率/转型/国际化]
□ 战略目标:[列表]
□ 当前所处阶段:[规划/执行/评估]
假设来源识别:
□ 外部假设(公司无法控制):
→ 市场假设:市场规模/增速/份额
→ 竞争假设:竞争对手行为/进入者
→ 政策假设:监管环境/贸易政策
→ 技术假设:技术路线/颠覆性创新
□ 内部假设(公司可以影响):
→ 资源假设:资金/人才/产能
→ 能力假设:技术/运营/组织能力
→ 执行假设:执行速度/效率/优先级
□ 财务假设:
→ 收入假设:增长率/市场份额
→ 成本假设:原材料/人工/规模效应
→ 融资假设:融资成本/可获得性
第二步:假设结构化记录
假设清单:
| # | 假设类别 | 假设描述 | 关联战略目标 | 假设来源 | 置信度 |
|---|---------|---------|------------|---------|--------|
| 1 | [市场] | [描述] | [目标] | [分析师/内部] | [高/中/低] |
| 2 | [竞争] | [描述] | [目标] | [内部] | [高/中/低] |
| 3 | [财务] | [描述] | [目标] | [内部] | [高/中/低] |
□ 假设置信度评估:
→ 高置信度:有充分数据支持,近 3 年未发生重大变化
→ 中置信度:有一定依据,但存在不确定性
→ 低置信度:依赖外部因素,缺乏历史验证
关键假设识别(Critical Assumptions):
□ 高影响力假设(对战略目标影响 > [X]%):
→ 假设 1:[描述] — 关联目标 [名称] — 置信度 [低]
→ 假设 2:[描述] — 关联目标 [名称] — 置信度 [中]
□ 假设失效风险评估:
→ 假设 1:失效概率 [X]%,影响程度 [高/中/低]
→ 假设 2:失效概率 [X]%,影响程度 [高/中/低]
第三步:假设追踪
假设追踪机制:
□ 追踪频率:[每季度/每半年/每年]
□ 追踪责任人:[岗位/部门]
□ 触发事件追踪:[是/否] — 触发事件清单:
→ 市场假设:主要竞争对手重大行动
→ 政策假设:监管重大变化
→ 财务假设:实际结果与假设偏差 > [X]%
假设验证状态:
□ 假设 1:[描述]
→ 上期验证:[YYYY-MM] — [结论]
→ 本期状态:[✅ 成立 / ⚠️ 待观察 / 🔴 已失效]
→ 变化信号:[有/无] — [描述]
□ 假设 2:[描述]
→ ...
第四步:假设变化影响评估
假设失效影响分析:
□ 假设 1 已失效/即将失效:
→ 假设内容:[原假设] → [新情况]
→ 变化程度:[轻微/显著/根本性]
→ 对战略目标影响:
· [目标1]:[原预测值] → [新预测值]([±X]%)
· [目标2]:[原预测值] → [新预测值]([±X]%)
□ 连锁影响评估:
→ 假设 1 变化是否影响其他假设:[是/否]
→ 受影响假设:[假设2] — 影响方式 [描述]
战略脆弱性评估:
□ 战略对假设的敏感度:
→ 高度敏感(假设变化 → 目标偏差 > [X]%):[战略/目标列表]
→ 中度敏感(假设变化 → 目标偏差 [X-X]%):[战略/目标列表]
→ 低度敏感:[战略/目标列表]
□ 战略韧性评估:
→ 韧性强的方面:[描述]
→ 韧性弱的方面:[描述]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 241 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 96cc6eb39a26
strategic-assumption is a skill published in the GitHub repository vivy-yi/finance-skills (29 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,195 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
infographics
Create professional infographics using Nano Banana Pro AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3 Pro for quality review. Integrates research-lookup and web search for accurate data. Supports 10 infographic types, 8 industry styles, and colorblind-safe palettes.
similarity-search-patterns
Implement efficient similarity search with vector databases. Use when building semantic search, implementing nearest neighbor queries, or optimizing retrieval performance.
figma-implement-design
Translate Figma nodes into production-ready code with 1:1 visual fidelity using the Figma MCP workflow (design context, screenshots, assets, and project-convention translation). Trigger when the user provides Figma URLs or node IDs, or asks to implement designs or components that must match Figma specs. Requires a…
datavis
Comprehensive data visualization toolkit for creating beautiful, mathematically elegant visualizations with D3.js, Chart.js, and custom SVG. Use when (1) building interactive data visualizations, (2) designing color palettes for charts, (3) choosing scales and visual encodings, (4) creating data pipelines from…
spec-kit-vibe-compat
Compatibility router for /speckit. workflows into /vibe-first Codex execution.
detecting-data-anomalies
Investigate outliers, rare events, spikes, and suspicious records in datasets. Use as an explicit anomaly-analysis helper when you want concrete anomaly-detection workflow guidance, not generic data validation or end-to-end ML ownership.