argument-strength-evaluation

argument-strength-evaluation is a skill for Claude Code from vivy-yi/Greater-China-Legal. It costs 149 tokens per session (2,417 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A method for rating how reliable and persuasive a legal conclusion is and marking where its reasoning is weak.

In plain words
What is it for?
Quality-checking legal analyses by reviewing their legal basis, facts, logic, likely objections, court practice, and value judgments.
Why use it?
It helps expose unsupported facts, weak legal foundations, logical gaps, and competing interpretations after an analysis is written.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Good fit Quality-checking legal analyses by reviewing their legal basis, facts, logic, likely objections, court practice, and value judgments.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add vivy-yi/Greater-China-Legal --skill argument-strength-evaluation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vivy-yi/Greater-China-Legal

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for argument-strength-evaluation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for argument-strength-evaluation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vivy-yi/greater-china-legal/argument-strength-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 149 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,417 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00149 $0.02417
Opus 5.5 $0.00060 $0.00967
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00030 $0.00483
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00242

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 4c2bbc2677cf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

argument-strength-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/legal-atomic/argument-strength-evaluation/SKILL.md · 244 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 244 lines · 149 tokens per session scan A 4c2bbc2677cf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

argument-strength-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository vivy-yi/Greater-China-Legal (48 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 149 tokens to every session and 2,417 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories