aidoc-flow-framework: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/submit-feedback/SKILL.md

submit-feedback is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework. It costs 56 tokens per session (1,768 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repository workflow for recording bugs, documentation errors, and improvement ideas in the project's approved tracker. It searches for existing reports, checks permission, and records whether the finding came from real use or a review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to file an actionable issue in the repository's declared backlog, with the required labels, template, source project, and classification.
Why use it?
It prevents important findings from being left only in a chat, scratch file, commit message, or handoff. It also reduces duplicate reports and avoids writing to an unauthorized tracker.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on aidoc-flow-framework itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything aidoc-flow-framework configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/dev/.agents/skills/submit-feedback/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for submit-feedback

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for submit-feedback

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/submit-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,768 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.01768
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00707
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00354
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00177

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 46fc951c0a9e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

submit-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/submit-feedback/SKILL.md · 197 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Submit feedback

Muse-local instance of the submit-feedback workflow. Engine-agnostic wording follows framework/skills/submit-feedback/ (itself adapted from the canon aidoc-flow-claude-agents-config/skills/submit-feedback/SKILL.md); where the canon names a Claude-specific agent type or path, use the Muse equivalent below and keep the independence contract.

An actionable finding must survive the session that found it. Capture it on the owning repository's declared backlog surface; never leave it only in chat, scratch, a commit message, or a session handoff.

A finding also has to carry where it came from. A defect a real project hit and a defect a review pass went looking for read identically once written up, and the reader cannot recover the difference. Record it at capture time.

1. Establish authority and destination

Read the active repository's AGENTS.md chain and any linked governance contract. Determine:

  • the owning repository;
  • its declared backlog or tracker;
  • whether you may write there;
  • required labels, project state, or issue template;
  • whether it declares a priority label, and its form.

Filing in the active repository is allowed only when its instructions or the user authorize it. Writing to a different repository or external system needs explicit authorization. Never infer permission from common ownership, a nearby checkout, or an old hardcoded roster.

If the repository declares a file backlog, use that file. If it declares GitHub issues, use the workflow below. Do not create a second queue.

2. Promotion bar

Capture when any of these is true:

  • another person or session could act on it;
  • it reproduces at file:line and has a plausible fix shape;
  • it is user-visible or blocks a consumer.

Do not file speculation, a problem already fixed by the current change, or a duplicate. A local workaround does not remove the need to capture the owning defect.

3. Classify the origin

Every finding carries one of two origin classes, decided by a single falsifiable test — name what broke, or it is a review finding:

Read the full file on GitHub · 197 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 46fc951c0a9e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

submit-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework (17 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,768 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.