Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vmkteam/claude-plugins --skill mr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vmkteam/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vmkteam/claude-plugins/mr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vmkteam/claude-plugins/mr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vmkteam/claude-plugins/mr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vmkteam/claude-plugins/mr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vmkteam/claude-plugins/mr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01858 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00743 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00372 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
mr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MR Review — ревью чужого Merge Request
Полный цикл code review для MR в GitLab: получить diff, проанализировать код, опубликовать замечания как inline threads.
Подключения — из project-index.md в auto-memory проекта и ~/.claude/memory/infra-{group}.md.
Использование
/mr-review 42
/mr-review 42 --focus security
/mr-review 42 --focus performance
Flow
FETCH MR → READ CODE → REVIEW → SUMMARY → ⏸ HITL → PUBLISH
1. FETCH — получить MR
# Детали MR (title, description, author, source/target branch, diff_refs)
pcurl @{gl_profile} 'https://{gl_host}/api/v4/projects/{gl_project_id}/merge_requests/{mr_iid}' -s
# Diff (список изменённых файлов с содержимым)
pcurl @{gl_profile} 'https://{gl_host}/api/v4/projects/{gl_project_id}/merge_requests/{mr_iid}/changes' -s
# Коммиты MR
pcurl @{gl_profile} 'https://{gl_host}/api/v4/projects/{gl_project_id}/merge_requests/{mr_iid}/commits' -s
# Существующие discussions (чтобы не дублировать замечания)
pcurl @{gl_profile} 'https://{gl_host}/api/v4/projects/{gl_project_id}/merge_requests/{mr_iid}/discussions?per_page=100' -s
Извлечь:
diff_refs(base_sha, start_sha, head_sha) — нужны для inline comments- Список изменённых файлов и их diff
- Описание MR и связанную задачу (из title или description)
- Уже существующие замечания (не дублировать)
2. READ CODE — прочитать контекст
Для каждого изменённого файла:
- Прочитать полный файл локально (не только diff) — для понимания контекста
- Если ветка MR доступна локально —
git fetch origin && git checkout {source_branch} - Если нет — читать через API или анализировать diff as-is
Дополнительно:
- Прочитать связанную задачу из YouTrack (если ID в title/description)
- Понять что должен делать MR — сравнить intent с реализацией
3. REVIEW — анализ кода
Запустить /go-review в режиме MR: изменения — diff из шага 1 (или git diff origin/{target_branch}...origin/{source_branch}), preflight локальной базы не нужен. 6 ревьюеров:
- Common — соответствие задаче, полнота
- Architecture (Dave Cheney) — структура, зависимости
- Code (Rob Pike) — простота, читаемость
- Security (Filippo Valsorda) — уязвимости, authz
- Tests (Mitchell Hashimoto) — покрытие, качество тестов
- Operability (Peter Bourgon) — логирование, метрики, graceful degradation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · -2 lines b9fa79e53b8e
- 1mo ago First seen · 175 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 3996c192920f
mr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository vmkteam/claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,858 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…