vouch-standup

A command that creates a short stand-up briefing from the vouch knowledge base. The briefing covers pending reviews, recent decisions, outdated claims, and due follow-ups.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review proposal counts, recent decisions, stale information, and upcoming follow-ups with their owners.
Why use it?
It brings important knowledge-management work into one morning summary, including items that may need review or confirmation. It is read-only unless you explicitly ask to close a follow-up.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vouchdev/vouch/vouch-standup
Any agent
npx skills add vouchdev/vouch --skill vouch-standup
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vouchdev/vouch

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 24 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 235 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00024 $0.00235
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00118
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00047
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00023

Measured 3d ago against content hash 7afd439e2bfe, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vouch-standup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

adapters/openclaw/skills/vouch-standup/SKILL.md · 24 lines

What it actually says

/vouch-standup

Give the user a morning briefing from the KB, then get out of the way.

Steps:

  1. Call the kb_digest MCP tool (or run vouch digest --format markdown via Bash if MCP is unavailable). Default window is fine unless the user names one.
  2. Narrate it in four short lines, leading with counts: pending proposals (oldest first — nudge vouch review if any), decisions since the window start, stale claims worth a kb_confirm or supersede, and followups due (with owners).
  3. If a followup in the list is done, offer to file the close — a kb_propose_page with the page's id as slug_hint and followup_status: "done" — but only on explicit confirmation.

Read-only otherwise. Never call kb_approve; reviewing is the human's job.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 24 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 7afd439e2bfe

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vouch-standup is a skill published in the GitHub repository vouchdev/vouch (91 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 235 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.