Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add VoxTechnologies/anty-framework --skill anticipatory-sellinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VoxTechnologies/anty-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/anticipatory-selling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/anticipatory-selling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/anticipatory-selling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/anticipatory-selling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/anticipatory-selling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01195 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00598 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
anticipatory-selling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- anticipatory-selling — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Anticipatory Selling
When to Apply
- Deal reaches pipeline Step 5 (Overview Presented)
- Win rates at Steps 5-7 are declining
- Buyer needs internal approval or committee sign-off
- When the founder asks "how do I close this deal?"
- Proactively when pipeline has deals approaching Step 5
Core Principle
"You're not selling to the buyer — you're arming them to sell internally."
By the time a deal reaches Step 5, the buyer is often convinced. The real challenge is helping them convince their boss, CFO, procurement team, or board. Anticipatory selling provides pre-built ammunition for that internal sale.
Core Framework
5 Materials Package (Auto-Generated)
1. Competitive Comparison Table
Structure:
| Capability | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|-----------------|------------|-------------|-------------|
| [Core feature] | [strength] | [strength] | [weakness] |
| [Pricing model] | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] |
| [Support] | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] |
| Best for | [use case] | [use case] | [use case] |
Rules:
- Honest, not adversarial — acknowledge competitor strengths
- Use cases where each excels
- Price comparison using public data only
- "Best for" framing rather than "better than"
2. 3-Year TCO Analysis
Include ALL costs, not just license price:
- Software license/subscription (3-year total)
- Implementation and setup costs
- Training and onboarding time (monetized)
- Ongoing maintenance and administration
- Integration costs with existing stack
- Opportunity cost of alternatives (including "do nothing")
Format: side-by-side comparison with status quo and 1-2 alternatives.
3. Internal Proposal Template
Pre-written template the buyer can adapt and send to their decision-maker:
- Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
- Problem statement (grounded in buyer's specific pain)
- Proposed solution (mapped to their needs from Step 3-4)
- Expected ROI with conservative estimates
- Implementation timeline (phased, low-risk)
- Risk mitigation plan
- Next steps and decision timeline
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 121 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 8a8db220e850
anticipatory-selling is a skill published in the GitHub repository VoxTechnologies/anty-framework (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,195 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
choice-architecture
Nudge-based choice architecture for 3-option selection UI — smart default vs active choice, outcome mapping, channel factors, RECAP, operational transparency with source attribution, post-decision reinforcement, error-forgiving undo, peak-end session design, user contribution acknowledgment. Use when presenting…
pipeline
Cash Machine 10-step B2B sales pipeline with 3 presets, verifiable checkpoints per step, trajectory logging, bottleneck detection with utilization formula, lead qualification gate (BANT 6-criteria), pipeline velocity and stall detection (2x threshold), two-tier probability scoring, BBS tracking, end-of-quarter…
quest-interview
QUEST Socratic interview methodology — beginner stance, empathic neutrality, downward/upward questioning, echo questions, concept identification, permission checks, critical point pursuit, anti-pattern safeguards, resolution imbalance diagnostic, workaround discovery, painkiller vs vitamin test, locally famous test.…
review-engine
5-question review framework (result, execution, plan, strategy, analysis), KPI propagation monitoring with 4-layer anomaly patterns, One-Way/Two-Way Door classification, withdrawal decision protocol, and assumption provenance auditing. Use during periodic reviews, buffer zone changes, or when evaluating why results…
anticipatory-selling
Auto-generate 5 sales support materials for pipeline Steps 5-7 — competitive comparison table, 3-year TCO analysis, internal proposal template, objection rebuttals, phased implementation timeline. Core principle is arming the buyer to sell internally. Use when deals reach Step 5+ or when win rates at Steps 5-7 are low.
confidence
Contextual confidence calibration — DEFLATE for One-Way Doors and RED zones, PROTECT for Two-Way Doors and fundraising, "How does this work step by step?" depth testing, values-to-consequences redirect, unanimity as risk signal. From Knowledge Illusion — overconfidence is sometimes functional. Use when calibrating…