Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/disruptionnpx skills add VoxTechnologies/anty-framework --skill disruptiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VoxTechnologies/anty-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/disruption)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/disruption"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/disruption.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.01048 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00524 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
disruption scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- disruption — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Disruption Analysis
When to Apply
- Entering a market with established incumbents
- Evaluating competitive threats or opportunities
- Periodic strategic scan (six-force monitoring)
- When a competitor makes a move
- Strategy Kernel diagnosis of competitive landscape
Core Framework
Cannibalization Exposure Analysis
Incumbents fail not from blindness but from RATIONAL cannibalization avoidance. Estimate how much existing revenue an incumbent would destroy by adopting the disruptive approach:
Incumbent: [Competitor X]
Legacy revenue at risk: [estimated %]
HIGH exposure (>20% revenue at risk):
-> Incumbent has rational incentive to DELAY adoption
-> Window of opportunity: 18-24 months
-> "Half-hearted" response = signal of continued vulnerability
LOW exposure (<5% revenue at risk):
-> Incumbent can adopt without pain
-> Expect fast competitive response
-> Differentiation must be deeper than feature parity
Competitor Response Classification
| Response Type | Signal | Agent Advice |
|---|---|---|
| No response | Ignoring the threat | "Move fast. Build moat before they wake up." |
| Half-hearted (limited features bolted on) | MOST vulnerable — worst strategy | "Their hedge burns cash without commitment. This is your best window." |
| Full commitment (dedicated team, new product) | Genuine threat | "They're serious. Differentiate on depth, speed, or segment." |
Half-hearted response is the best signal for the disruptor. It means the incumbent recognizes the threat but cannot fully commit due to cannibalization risk. This is when to accelerate.
Market Entry Signal (Barrier Inference)
Observe entry patterns to infer innovation barrier height:
Entry/Prize Ratio:
Estimated TAM: $[X]B
New entrants (last 12 months): [N]
HIGH ratio (many entrants, moderate prize):
-> Innovation barrier is LOW
-> Rapid commoditization expected
-> "Many entrants for the prize size. Moat is critical."
LOW ratio (few entrants, large prize):
-> Innovation barrier is HIGH
-> Structural moat if you can enter
-> "Few entrants despite enormous prize. If you enter,
the barrier itself is your moat."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 100 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 5849962fa4c5
disruption is a skill published in the GitHub repository VoxTechnologies/anty-framework (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,048 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
choice-architecture
Nudge-based choice architecture for 3-option selection UI — smart default vs active choice, outcome mapping, channel factors, RECAP, operational transparency with source attribution, post-decision reinforcement, error-forgiving undo, peak-end session design, user contribution acknowledgment. Use when presenting…
culture-map
Erin Meyer's Culture Map with 8 dimensions, 5 launch presets (US, JP, DE, UK, FR), Layer A agent-user adaptation, Layer B content-target market adaptation, and anti-sycophancy tone calibration per culture. Use when adapting communication style to the founder's culture, localizing content for target markets, or when…
failure-essence
4 strategic failure patterns from Essence of Failure — dual-objective trap (conflict stress test), strategic ambiguity (operationalizability test), withdrawal decision protocol (pre-committed stop conditions, re-present biweekly), assumption provenance auditing (source, verification, load-bearing flag, sample size).…
pipeline
Cash Machine 10-step B2B sales pipeline with 3 presets, verifiable checkpoints per step, trajectory logging, bottleneck detection with utilization formula, lead qualification gate (BANT 6-criteria), pipeline velocity and stall detection (2x threshold), two-tier probability scoring, BBS tracking, end-of-quarter…
plan-b
Plan B framework — 6 environmental forces monitoring, pre-mortem 5-step process, scenario planning with auto-trigger points, Devil's Advocate on every proposal, 100-day gate reviews, S-curve awareness, 5 hurdles to Plan B execution, boomerang prevention. Use when preparing contingencies, monitoring environmental…
quest-interview
QUEST Socratic interview methodology — beginner stance, empathic neutrality, downward/upward questioning, echo questions, concept identification, permission checks, critical point pursuit, anti-pattern safeguards, resolution imbalance diagnostic, workaround discovery, painkiller vs vitamin test, locally famous test.…