Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add VoxTechnologies/anty-framework --skill growth-metricsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VoxTechnologies/anty-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/growth-metrics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/growth-metrics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/growth-metrics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/growth-metrics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/growth-metrics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
growth-metrics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- growth-metrics — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Growth Metrics & Benchmarks
When to Apply
- Setting or validating Goal metrics during onboarding
- Weekly growth tracking and projections
- When growth rate changes significantly
- When the founder proposes tracking a new metric
- When vanity metrics are suspected
Core Framework
YC Weekly Growth Benchmarks
| Weekly Growth | Assessment | Agent Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| < 1% | Critical | "Growth is flat. Fundamental rethink needed. Trigger WHY analysis." |
| 1-3% | Weak | "Below YC threshold. Prioritize growth experiments." |
| 3-5% | Moderate | "Directionally correct. Look for acceleration levers." |
| 5-7% | Good | "Strong growth. Maintain and compound." |
| 7%+ | Excellent | "YC-grade growth. Focus on sustainability." |
Growth rate auto-calculated from Goal metric history. Decline triggers automatic investigation.
T2D3 SaaS Trajectory
For B2B SaaS from $1M ARR:
Year 1: Triple -> $3M
Year 2: Triple -> $9M
Year 3: Double -> $18M
Year 4: Double -> $36M
Year 5: Double -> $72M
Track actual growth rate against this trajectory. Falling behind T2D3 in early years is a strong signal to investigate product-market fit.
Compound Projection Formula
Goal: 100 Paying Customers (Q2 end)
Current: 34 | Last week: 31 | Growth: +9.7%/week
Compound projection at current rate:
-> 4 weeks: 49 customers
-> 8 weeks: 72 customers
-> 12 weeks: 104 customers <- Goal achievable
Required weekly growth to hit Goal: +7.4%/week
Status: ON TRACK (current 9.7% > required 7.4%)
Auto-calculate and display projections at current rate vs required rate.
North Star Metric Enforcement
Auto-recommend by business model during onboarding:
| Business Model | Recommended North Star | Vanity Alternatives (reject) |
|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS | MRR / Revenue | Signups, page views, registered users |
| Consumer app | DAU / WAU | Downloads, app installs, total accounts |
| Marketplace | GMV x take rate (net revenue) | Raw GMV, listing count |
| E-commerce | Revenue / order count | Website visitors, cart additions |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 110 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 66fa1813b0e1
growth-metrics is a skill published in the GitHub repository VoxTechnologies/anty-framework (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,107 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
choice-architecture
Nudge-based choice architecture for 3-option selection UI — smart default vs active choice, outcome mapping, channel factors, RECAP, operational transparency with source attribution, post-decision reinforcement, error-forgiving undo, peak-end session design, user contribution acknowledgment. Use when presenting…
failure-essence
4 strategic failure patterns from Essence of Failure — dual-objective trap (conflict stress test), strategic ambiguity (operationalizability test), withdrawal decision protocol (pre-committed stop conditions, re-present biweekly), assumption provenance auditing (source, verification, load-bearing flag, sample size).…
pipeline
Cash Machine 10-step B2B sales pipeline with 3 presets, verifiable checkpoints per step, trajectory logging, bottleneck detection with utilization formula, lead qualification gate (BANT 6-criteria), pipeline velocity and stall detection (2x threshold), two-tier probability scoring, BBS tracking, end-of-quarter…
plan-b
Plan B framework — 6 environmental forces monitoring, pre-mortem 5-step process, scenario planning with auto-trigger points, Devil's Advocate on every proposal, 100-day gate reviews, S-curve awareness, 5 hurdles to Plan B execution, boomerang prevention. Use when preparing contingencies, monitoring environmental…
quest-interview
QUEST Socratic interview methodology — beginner stance, empathic neutrality, downward/upward questioning, echo questions, concept identification, permission checks, critical point pursuit, anti-pattern safeguards, resolution imbalance diagnostic, workaround discovery, painkiller vs vitamin test, locally famous test.…
review-engine
5-question review framework (result, execution, plan, strategy, analysis), KPI propagation monitoring with 4-layer anomaly patterns, One-Way/Two-Way Door classification, withdrawal decision protocol, and assumption provenance auditing. Use during periodic reviews, buffer zone changes, or when evaluating why results…