review-engine

review-engine is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from VoxTechnologies/anty-framework. It costs 66 tokens per session (1,558 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for creating a new WordPress project from a starter theme and replacing its placeholders. It also configures translation settings and creates the project instructions file for the coding agent.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to choose a starter template, create the theme structure, configure supported languages, and generate the project's CLAUDE.md file. It also accepts the older basic template name as an alias for the Tailwind template.
Why use it?
It avoids repeating the setup work for each new WordPress project and reduces errors from inconsistent names or missing configuration. It supports both a Tailwind-based starter and a cinematic scrolling starter.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the anty plugin — 24 skills, 11 commands, 4 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/review-engine
Any agent
npx skills add VoxTechnologies/anty-framework --skill review-engine
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VoxTechnologies/anty-framework

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install anty, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 24 skills, 11 commands, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-engine

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/review-engine.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/review-engine)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/review-engine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/voxtechnologies/anty-framework/review-engine.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,558 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00066 $0.01558
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.00779
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00312
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00156

Measured 4d ago against content hash ad0ce5606c99, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-engine scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/review-engine/SKILL.md · 152 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Engine

When to Apply

  • After each periodic scan
  • When buffer zone changes
  • When Actions complete but Goal doesn't progress
  • Quarterly strategy reviews
  • When the founder asks "why isn't this working?"

Core Framework

5-Question Review (Strict Priority Order)

Start at Question 1. Only proceed deeper if the answer is "yes" (problem isn't at that level):

Priority Question Scope If "No"
1 Has the Goal progressed since last review? WHERE Re-run WHERE analysis to locate new gap
2 Were approved Actions executed as planned? Execution Investigate blockers, check relay runner compliance
3 Was the Action plan well-constructed? Planning Review Step breakdown, batch config, template fit
4 Were the chosen Actions appropriate? HOW Re-run 3-option choice with different approaches
5 Was the root-cause analysis correct? WHY Rebuild causal structure diagram from scratch

This prevents the common trap of never questioning upstream assumptions.

KPI Propagation Monitoring (4-Layer)

Actions are monitored for whether effects propagate upward through the causal chain:

Action: "Post 4 thought-leadership threads per week"
  |
  KPI Layer 1 (Execution): Threads posted per week
  -> "Is the Action being executed?" (target: 4/week)
  |
  KPI Layer 2 (Propagation): Engagement rate per thread
  -> "Is it producing the expected intermediate effect?"
  |
  KPI Layer 3 (Driver metric): Monthly new followers
  -> "Is the Driver metric moving?"
  |
  KGI (Goal metric): Paying customers
  -> "Is it reaching the Goal?"

4-Layer Anomaly Patterns:

Pattern Diagnosis Response
Layer 1 failing Action not being executed Check blockers, re-prioritize, enforce relay runner
L1 OK, L2 stalling Action executed but ineffective Trigger WHY analysis on L1-L2 gap
L1-2 OK, L3 stalling Intermediate effect not converting KPI tree may need re-decomposition
All layers OK, KGI stalling Causal model may be wrong Full review (Question 5)

Read the full file on GitHub · 152 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 152 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A ad0ce5606c99

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-engine is a skill published in the GitHub repository VoxTechnologies/anty-framework (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,558 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

choice-architecture

Nudge-based choice architecture for 3-option selection UI — smart default vs active choice, outcome mapping, channel factors, RECAP, operational transparency with source attribution, post-decision reinforcement, error-forgiving undo, peak-end session design, user contribution acknowledgment. Use when presenting…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 72 tokens

culture-map

Erin Meyer's Culture Map with 8 dimensions, 5 launch presets (US, JP, DE, UK, FR), Layer A agent-user adaptation, Layer B content-target market adaptation, and anti-sycophancy tone calibration per culture. Use when adapting communication style to the founder's culture, localizing content for target markets, or when…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 79 tokens

failure-essence

4 strategic failure patterns from Essence of Failure — dual-objective trap (conflict stress test), strategic ambiguity (operationalizability test), withdrawal decision protocol (pre-committed stop conditions, re-present biweekly), assumption provenance auditing (source, verification, load-bearing flag, sample size).…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 79 tokens

pipeline

Cash Machine 10-step B2B sales pipeline with 3 presets, verifiable checkpoints per step, trajectory logging, bottleneck detection with utilization formula, lead qualification gate (BANT 6-criteria), pipeline velocity and stall detection (2x threshold), two-tier probability scoring, BBS tracking, end-of-quarter…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 84 tokens

plan-b

Plan B framework — 6 environmental forces monitoring, pre-mortem 5-step process, scenario planning with auto-trigger points, Devil's Advocate on every proposal, 100-day gate reviews, S-curve awareness, 5 hurdles to Plan B execution, boomerang prevention. Use when preparing contingencies, monitoring environmental…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 80 tokens

quest-interview

QUEST Socratic interview methodology — beginner stance, empathic neutrality, downward/upward questioning, echo questions, concept identification, permission checks, critical point pursuit, anti-pattern safeguards, resolution imbalance diagnostic, workaround discovery, painkiller vs vitamin test, locally famous test.…

Ingramradical235/anty-framework · 74 tokens