Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/main/.agents/skills/source-command-qcheck/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vscarpenter/gsd-task-managerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/source-command-qcheck)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/source-command-qcheck"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/source-command-qcheck/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/source-command-qcheck"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager/source-command-qcheck.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00563 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00225 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
source-command-qcheck scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 33 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
source-command-qcheck
Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command qcheck.
Command Template
Review all changed files in this session as a skeptical staff engineer for the gsd-taskmanager codebase. Apply the full coding-standards.md and AGENTS.md rules.
Run git status and git diff first to see what has changed. Then evaluate each changed file against:
- Standards compliance — The limits in
coding-standards.mdPart 3 (functions ≤40 lines, files ~400 lines, ≤3 nesting levels, no magic numbers), descriptive naming. - Type safety — All function signatures typed, no
anywithout justification, Zod validation at boundaries (user input, import, MCP tool inputs). - TDD evidence — Were tests written first? Check git log if uncertain. Each new behavior should have a behavior-named test.
- Test quality — Positive AND negative cases. Coverage ≥80% for changed files. Independent tests (no shared mutable state). Mocks at boundaries, not deep.
- Error handling — Typed errors, no swallowed exceptions,
toast.error()from sonner instead ofwindow.alert(). - Project-specific gotchas:
- PocketBase:
client_updated_at(notupdated) in sort/filter,_superusersadmin endpoint, 100ms push throttle, batch lookups not N+1. - Schema:
.safeParse()(not.parse()) on user input paths; import uses.strip(), export uses.strict(). - Tests:
bun run test(notbun test);localStorage.removeItem(key)(notclear()). - UI:
toast.error()(notalert()); WCAG AA baseline fromCLAUDE.mdDesign Context.
- PocketBase:
- Security — Input validation, no committed secrets, parameterized queries, least privilege.
- Observability — Structured logging via
lib/logger.ts, noconsole.*in production paths, no PII in logs. - Exit checklist — Every box for the task's tier in
coding-standards.mdPart 7 "Tiered Exit Checklists".
Distinguish blocking issues from suggestions. Prefix non-blocking comments with nit: or suggestion:.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 846ad05d3e29
- 2mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 2b61b38a2657
source-command-qcheck is a skill published in the GitHub repository vscarpenter/gsd-task-manager (40 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 563 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews a supplied code path or diff for correctness, security, maintainability, and style without executing or modifying it.
reviewing-update-sets
Reviewing, analyzing, and comparing ServiceNow update sets before promotion, singly or in batches. Shows changes, risks, dependencies, and conflicts. Use when the user mentions update sets, customizations, promotion, code review, change tracking, pre-deployment review, sysupdatexml, customer updates, 'what changed in…
gitlab-review
Review a GitLab merge request, inspect changes and discussions, or prepare and post explicitly requested review feedback. Use for GitLab MRs and review follow-ups, not GitHub pull requests or automatic approval/merge.
pr-reviewer
Review a requested pull request, branch diff or completed task against its actual scope, source and checks. Prepare evidence and comments; post or record a human verdict only when explicitly authorized.
knowledge-audit
Review and clean up stored memories — find duplicates, contradictions, stale entries, and consolidate.
review-guidelines
Additional code review guidelines specific to this codebase. Auto-loaded by the review agent during PR reviews to enforce project conventions.