Pydantic Deep Agents is a self-hosted terminal AI assistant and Python framework for building coding, research, and other AI agents. It gives agents tools such as file access, shell commands, planning, memory, sub-agents, sandboxed execution, and MCP connections, and supports different models.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- systematic-debugging — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Debugging
A structured approach to finding and fixing bugs.
The Debugging Loop
1. REPRODUCE → 2. ISOLATE → 3. DIAGNOSE → 4. FIX → 5. VERIFY
Never skip steps. Never guess-and-check repeatedly.
Step 1: Reproduce
- Run the exact command that fails
- Capture FULL output (stdout AND stderr)
- Note: exit code, error message, stack trace
- If intermittent, identify what changes between runs
Step 2: Isolate
- What's the MINIMAL input that triggers the error?
- Which specific line/function fails? (read the traceback bottom-up)
- Is it a compile error, runtime error, or wrong output?
- Does it fail on all inputs or specific ones?
Step 3: Diagnose
Read the error message carefully
| Error type | Where to look |
|---|---|
| Compile error | The FIRST error (later ones are often cascading) |
| Segfault | Last function in the stack trace, check array bounds and null pointers |
| Python traceback | The innermost frame (bottom), but also check the middle for context |
| Wrong output | Diff expected vs actual: diff <(expected) <(actual) |
| Timeout/hang | Is it an infinite loop? Deadlock? I/O bound? Add a timer or counter |
Add minimal instrumentation
- C:
fprintf(stderr, "reached checkpoint %d\n", __LINE__); - Python:
print(f"DEBUG: {var=}", file=sys.stderr) - Check intermediate values, not just final output
- Remove debug prints after fixing
Step 4: Fix
- Change ONE thing at a time
- If the same approach fails 3 times → completely different strategy
- Don't add workarounds — fix the root cause
- Common root causes:
- Off-by-one errors (loop bounds, array indexing)
- Type mismatches (int vs float, signed vs unsigned)
- Encoding issues (UTF-8 vs bytes)
- Path errors (relative vs absolute, missing trailing slash)
- Race conditions (file not written yet, process not started)
Step 5: Verify
- Run the same command that failed before
- Test with multiple inputs, not just the one that was failing
- Check edge cases: empty input, single element, very large input
- Run any existing test suite
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1f65a08595e6
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents (1,103 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-assistant
Helps debug Python errors and exceptions.
python-debugging
Use this skill when fixing failing Python tests.
mcp-apps-builder
MANDATORY for ALL MCP server work - mcp-use framework best practices and patterns. READ THIS FIRST before any MCP server work, including: Creating new MCP servers Modifying existing MCP servers (adding/updating tools, resources, prompts, widgets) Debugging MCP server issues or errors Reviewing MCP server code for…
pydantic-ai
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.
python-code-quality
Code quality checks, linting, formatting, and type checking commands for the Agent Framework Python codebase. Use this when running checks, fixing lint errors, or troubleshooting CI failures.
building-pydantic-ai-agents
Build AI agents with Pydantic AI — tools, capabilities (including on-demand loading), workspaces, structured output, streaming, testing, and multi-agent patterns. Use when the user mentions Pydantic AI, imports pydanticai, or asks to build an AI agent, add tools/capabilities, attach a workspace, defer capability…