Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vulhunt-re/skills --skill decompilergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vulhunt-re/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vulhunt-re/skills/decompiler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vulhunt-re/skills/decompiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vulhunt-re/skills/decompiler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vulhunt-re/skills/decompiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vulhunt-re/skills/decompiler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
decompiler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 41 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c0feed179a88
decompiler is a skill published in the GitHub repository vulhunt-re/skills (15 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Reverse Engineering & Binary Analysis
Binary analysis, assembly interpretation, disassembly, decompilation, firmware RE, and protocol reverse engineering.
technical-debt-audit
Use when the user says 'clean up my wordpress', 'what is bloating my wordpress', 'find orphaned shortcodes', or 'scan for unused plugins'. Audits orphaned shortcodes from deleted plugins, unused plugins, database bloat, unused media, and leftover data from inactive builders.
wordpress-site-dna
Use when the user says 'analyze my wordpress site', 'what is running on my site', 'site dna', or 'what plugins are on my site'. Detects every page builder, audits active versus dead-weight plugins, maps content structure, finds orphaned shortcodes, and checks performance and security posture.
diagnosing-ml-failures
Isolate the root cause of ML performance drops, inconsistent evaluations, prediction errors, and training-serving mismatches across data, labels, splits, pipelines, models, metrics, and runtime behavior. Use when investigating a reproducible failure or regression, not routine model selection or general performance…
fix-issues
Use when fixing software issues in a repository, including bug reports, failing tests, CI failures, compile errors, runtime errors, regressions, dependency problems, and requests such as "fix this issue", "resolve this bug", "make tests pass", or "address the failure". Guides Codex through issue triage, reproduction…
debug-teacher
Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.