Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill account-research-common-roomgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/account-research-common-room)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/account-research-common-room"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/account-research-common-room/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/account-research-common-room"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/account-research-common-room.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
account-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to account-research — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Account Research
Retrieve and synthesize account information from Common Room. Handles four interaction patterns: full overviews, targeted field questions, sparse data situations, and combined MCP data + LLM reasoning.
Step 0: Load User Context (Me)
Before researching any account, fetch the Me object from Common Room. This provides:
- The user's profile, title, role, and Persona in CR
- The user's segments ("My Segments")
Default all queries to the user's own segments unless the user explicitly asks for a broader view. This keeps results scoped to their territory.
Step 1: Identify the Interaction Pattern
Determine what the user actually needs before deciding how much data to fetch:
Pattern 1 — Full Overview: "Tell me about Datadog" / "Summarize cloudflare.com" → Fetch the full field set and produce a structured briefing.
Pattern 2 — Targeted Question: "Who owns the Snowflake account?" / "Is acme.io showing buying signals?" / "What's the employee count for notion.so?" → Fetch only the relevant field(s). Return a direct, concise answer — do not produce a full brief for a simple question.
Pattern 3 — Sparse Data: "Tell me about tiny-startup.io" → If Common Room has limited data for an account, say so honestly: "There is limited information available for this account." Never speculate or fill gaps with generic statements.
Pattern 4 — Combined Reasoning: Fetch structured MCP data, then layer in LLM analysis — e.g., "Stripe has 8,000 employees and is hiring heavily for AI roles. Based on your ICP of 1k–10k fintech companies, this is a strong fit."
Step 2: Look Up the Account
Search Common Room for the account by domain or company name. Exact match first; if no result, try partial match and confirm with the user before proceeding.
Step 3: Fetch the Right Fields
Use the Common Room object catalog to see available field groups and their contents. For full overviews, request all field groups. For targeted questions, request only what's relevant.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 141 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 66288f1275c4
account-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills (198 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,338 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to account-research, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-por-referencia
Use when a landing page, marketing site, or hero section looks generic/AI-made ("cara de vibe coding") and needs a $10k-agency-level redesign, or when building a new landing from scratch. Triggers - "o site ficou com cara de IA", "quero uma landing premium", "redesenha a landing", "faz o site baseado em [site de…
lighthouse-95
Use when a website must score 95+ in every Lighthouse category (Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, SEO), when scores are stuck below target, or when diagnosing poor FCP, LCP, TBT, or CLS on a deployed site.
seo-validate
SEO validator: meta/OG, Schema.org, hreflang, Core Web Vitals, crawlability. Triggers: SEO, meta tags, Schema.org, hreflang, LCP, INP, CLS, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, crawlability.
debug
Systematic debugging via logs, health checks, hypothesis-driven investigation. Triggers: debug, error, trace root cause, fix bug, reproduce symptom, investigation.
pr
Creates GitHub PR after pre-flight checks (lint/typecheck/tests), structured summary from commits. Triggers: pr, pull request, create PR, ready to merge.
research-mastery
Hierarchical retrieval: KB → MCP/Context7 → web. Triggers: research, fact-check, verify, synthesize, cross-reference, multi-source, cite sources.