Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill buyer-listgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/buyer-list)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/buyer-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/buyer-list/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/buyer-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/buyer-list.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00843 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
buyer-list scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to buyer-list — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Buyer List
description: Build and organize a universe of potential acquirers for sell-side M&A processes. Identifies strategic and financial buyers, assesses fit, and prioritizes outreach. Use when preparing for a sell-side mandate, building a buyer universe, or evaluating potential partners. Triggers on "buyer list", "buyer universe", "potential acquirers", "who would buy this", "strategic buyers", or "financial sponsors".
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Target
- Company description, sector, and business model
- Revenue, EBITDA, and growth profile
- Key assets and capabilities (IP, customer relationships, geographic footprint, team)
- Expected valuation range
- Seller preferences (strategic vs. financial, management continuity, timeline)
Step 2: Strategic Buyers
Identify strategic acquirers across categories:
Direct Competitors
- Companies in the same space that would gain market share
- Rationale: Revenue synergies, eliminate competitor, scale
Adjacent Players
- Companies in adjacent markets that could expand into the target's space
- Rationale: Product extension, cross-sell, new market entry
Vertical Integrators
- Customers or suppliers that could integrate vertically
- Rationale: Supply chain control, margin capture, strategic lock-in
Platform Builders
- Large companies building a platform in the space through M&A
- Rationale: Tuck-in acquisition, fill capability gap
For each strategic buyer, assess:
| Buyer | Sector | Revenue | Strategic Fit | Financial Capacity | M&A Track Record | Likelihood | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High/Med/Low | Active/Moderate/None | A/B/C |
Step 3: Financial Sponsors
Identify PE/financial buyers:
Platform Investors
- Sponsors looking for a new platform in this sector
- Criteria: Fund size, sector focus, deal size range
Add-on Buyers
- Sponsors with existing portfolio companies that could acquire the target as a bolt-on
- Identify the specific portfolio company and synergy rationale
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 96 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3eb4e11b12ca
buyer-list is a skill published in the GitHub repository w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills (198 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 843 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to buyer-list, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
financial-expert
A financial research skill for China and Hong Kong securities, funds, company finances, economic indicators, research reports, announcements, news, and business-risk data. It returns data and neutral analysis rather than placing trades or recommending investments.
stock-analysis-lead
Orchestrate a US-stock investment analysis — classify sector archetype, fetch SEC filings, dispatch a tiered fan-out of six vertical equity-research agents (business model, earnings quality, balance sheet, management, industry, peer comparison) over a validated JSON findings contract, then synthesize a buy/hold/sell…
stock-business-review
Review a US-listed company's business model and revenue structure for an equity-research workup. Covers product/service mix, customer concentration, geographic exposure, industry position, revenue-growth decomposition (organic vs acquired vs price vs volume), and information-tier discipline (which numbers are facts vs…
stock-earnings-quality-review
Review a US-listed company's earnings quality, cash-flow integrity, and operating leverage for an equity-research workup. Covers operating cash flow vs net income drift, free cash flow trajectory, capex character (maintenance vs expansion), equity issuance / shareholder-return yield, revenue-quality signals…
stock-balance-sheet-review
Review a US-listed company's balance sheet health for an equity-research workup. Covers net-debt/EBITDA leverage, current ratio, cash runway, goodwill concentration and impairment history, DSO trend, inventory days, off-balance-sheet items (operating leases, contingent liabilities), and pension underfunding. Trigger…
stock-industry-review
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand /…