Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill client-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/client-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/client-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/client-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/client-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/client-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00737 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
client-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to client-review — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Client Review Prep
description: Prepare for client review meetings with portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, and action items. Pulls together account data into a concise meeting-ready format. Use before quarterly reviews, annual checkups, or ad-hoc client meetings. Triggers on "client review", "meeting prep for [client]", "quarterly review", "prep for [client name]", or "client meeting".
Workflow
Step 1: Client Context
Gather or look up:
- Client name and household members
- Account types: Taxable, IRA, Roth, 401(k), trust, etc.
- Total AUM across accounts
- Investment Policy Statement (IPS): Target allocation, risk tolerance, constraints
- Life stage: Accumulation, pre-retirement, retirement, legacy
- Last meeting date and any outstanding action items
Step 2: Portfolio Performance
For each account and the household aggregate:
| Metric | QTD | YTD | 1-Year | 3-Year | Since Inception |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio return | |||||
| Benchmark return | |||||
| Alpha |
Performance Attribution:
- Which asset classes / positions drove returns?
- Top 3 contributors and top 3 detractors
- Any outsized single-position impact?
Step 3: Allocation Review
Current vs. target allocation:
| Asset Class | Target | Current | Drift | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Large Cap | ||||
| US Mid/Small | ||||
| International Developed | ||||
| Emerging Markets | ||||
| Fixed Income | ||||
| Alternatives | ||||
| Cash |
Flag any drift exceeding the IPS rebalancing threshold (typically 3-5%).
Step 4: Talking Points
Generate a meeting agenda:
- Market overview (2-3 min): Brief macro context and outlook
- Portfolio performance (5 min): How did we do? Why?
- Allocation review (5 min): Any rebalancing needed?
- Planning updates (5-10 min):
- Life changes? (job, health, family, home, education)
- Income needs changing?
- Tax situation updates
- Estate planning updates
- Action items (5 min): What are we doing before next meeting?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b9ba1ed4f0ea
client-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills (198 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 737 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to client-review, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
financial-expert
A financial research skill for China and Hong Kong securities, funds, company finances, economic indicators, research reports, announcements, news, and business-risk data. It returns data and neutral analysis rather than placing trades or recommending investments.
stock-analysis-lead
Orchestrate a US-stock investment analysis — classify sector archetype, fetch SEC filings, dispatch a tiered fan-out of six vertical equity-research agents (business model, earnings quality, balance sheet, management, industry, peer comparison) over a validated JSON findings contract, then synthesize a buy/hold/sell…
stock-business-review
Review a US-listed company's business model and revenue structure for an equity-research workup. Covers product/service mix, customer concentration, geographic exposure, industry position, revenue-growth decomposition (organic vs acquired vs price vs volume), and information-tier discipline (which numbers are facts vs…
stock-earnings-quality-review
Review a US-listed company's earnings quality, cash-flow integrity, and operating leverage for an equity-research workup. Covers operating cash flow vs net income drift, free cash flow trajectory, capex character (maintenance vs expansion), equity issuance / shareholder-return yield, revenue-quality signals…
stock-balance-sheet-review
Review a US-listed company's balance sheet health for an equity-research workup. Covers net-debt/EBITDA leverage, current ratio, cash runway, goodwill concentration and impairment history, DSO trend, inventory days, off-balance-sheet items (operating leases, contingent liabilities), and pension underfunding. Trigger…
stock-industry-review
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand /…