Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/waddling-penguin/mogkit/_examplenpx skills add Waddling-Penguin/mogkit --skill _examplegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Waddling-Penguin/mogkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/waddling-penguin/mogkit/_example)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waddling-penguin/mogkit/_example"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waddling-penguin/mogkit/_example.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00406 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
_example scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Purpose
This is a structural example, not a working skill. It exists so a new contributor can
copy this folder, replace the content, and know their SKILL.md will validate. It
deliberately does nothing useful: there is no real methodology behind it, and the
output below is a placeholder pattern, not a genuine reasoning aid.
The real skills under skills/standalone/ and (in Phase 3) skills/discovery/ show
how a sharp, specific skill is written. Read those before authoring your own.
Procedure
- Read the pasted input.
- Note one observable thing about it.
- Note one thing the input does not tell you.
- Note one action that would close the gap.
- Emit the output contract below. Do not exceed it.
Output contract
Emit exactly these three sections.
What we know
The single observable thing about the input. One line.
What we don't
The single missing piece. One line.
What to do next
The single action that would close the gap. One line.
Guardrails
- Do not emit prose beyond the three lines above. The point of this example is shape, not content.
- Do not invent facts about the input that are not present in it.
- Do not treat this skill as a real reasoning aid — it is a template. Replace it before shipping anything to a PM.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 52 lines · 1 tokens per session scan A 4209e2b7a3be
_example is a skill published in the GitHub repository Waddling-Penguin/mogkit (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1 tokens to every session and 406 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
emdash-cli
Use the EmDash CLI to manage content, schema, media, and more. Use this skill when you need to interact with a running EmDash instance from the command line — creating content, managing collections, uploading media, generating types, or scripting CMS operations.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
investigate
Investigate a single EmDash issue end to end -- classify, choose a repro path, reproduce, diagnose, verify, and (only on an explicit maintainer fix directive) fix and confirm. Every verdict carries its evidence.
repro-admin
Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.
repro-public
Reproduce a bug in the public-facing rendered site (not the admin). Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive public routes with agent-browser, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.
verify
Decide whether the diagnosed behaviour is actually a bug or the code doing what it was designed to do. This is the gate that guards the fix stage.