Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control --skill extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-jsongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-controlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.01264 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.00632 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Persist a Workflow's large markdown field by parsing its output JSON — never retype it
Problem
A Workflow's synthesis agent(..., {schema}) returns a big markdown deliverable in a schema
field (e.g. next_prompt_markdown, report, plan). You want it on disk. The instinct is to
copy it out of the completion <task-notification> (or the truncated tool result) into a Write
call. Two failures follow:
- Truncation loss — the notification/tool result is capped (often a few hundred lines / ~25-35k
tokens) with
... (truncated N chars, full result in <path>). Retyping from it silently drops everything past the cap. - Escape leakage — inside the JSON the field is escaped: newlines are literal
\n, quotes are\". Hand-copying (or reflowing) it often ships those escapes as literal text in the saved file, so the markdown renders as one line with visible\n.
Context / Trigger conditions
- A
Workflow/ backgroundAgentfinished; its result contains a long markdown/string field you want to save as a.md(a next-session prompt, a synthesized report, generated copy). - The
<task-notification>saysfull result in /private/tmp/.../tasks/<task-id>.output. - You're tempted to Write the content by retyping it from what you can see.
Solution
The full, unescaped result is always persisted to the output file named in the notification
(.../tasks/<task-id>.output, a JSON envelope {summary, agentCount, logs, result}). Parse it and
write the field — let json.load do the unescaping; never retype.
OUT="/private/tmp/.../tasks/<task-id>.output" # path from the <task-notification>
python3 - "$OUT" <<'PY'
import json, sys
r = json.load(open(sys.argv[1]))["result"]
# navigate to the field (e.g. result.synthesis.next_prompt_markdown)
doc = r["synthesis"]["next_prompt_markdown"]
open("docs/handoffs/the_doc.md", "w").write("<your header>\n\n" + doc + "\n")
PY
- Prepend your own header in the same script (provenance line, run id) rather than editing after.
- If you also want a human-readable provenance/evidence doc from the other structured fields
(e.g. each investigator's
current_state/files_to_touch), build it in the SAME python pass — you already have the parsed object. - This also works for a foreground
Agentwhose final text you saved, and for resuming from a killed run via theagent-*.jsonltranscripts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 85 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 9e26a7ec51ef
extract-workflow-markdown-from-output-json is a skill published in the GitHub repository wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 1,264 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
codex-coplan
Bring in an external model (Codex) to co-develop a plan — both models draft independently, align on disagreements, and merge into one plan. Load this only when the user explicitly names Codex (e.g. "let's discuss this with Codex," "what does Codex think about this approach") — don't auto-trigger just because a plan…
codex-orchestrator
Delegate execution tasks to Codex (Claude plans and reviews). Load this only when the user names Codex explicitly — no matter how big the task is, if the user hasn't mentioned Codex, do it yourself.
good-bad-ugly
Use when the user asks to "orchestrate", "conduct", invoke "good bad ugly" / "gbu", or tackle a large multi-part coding task (audits, refactor sweeps, multi-feature sessions, "clean this up and fix everything") — anything too big for one linear pass. Runs the tiered orchestration workflow: The Good (brain) plans and…
orchestrate
Use only when the user explicitly types /orchestrate:orchestrate to decompose a large task, spawn a tree of parallel worker/subplanner/verifier subagents, and collect structured handoffs. Do not invoke autonomously.
api-testing
HTTP API testing for TypeScript (Supertest) and Python (httpx, pytest). Test REST APIs, GraphQL, request/response validation, authentication, and error handling.
bun-test-coverage
Use for test coverage with Bun, --coverage flag, lcov reports, thresholds, and CI integration.