Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Wan-ZL/zelin-ai-assistant --skill test-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wan-ZL/zelin-ai-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-zl/zelin-ai-assistant/test-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-zl/zelin-ai-assistant/test-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-zl/zelin-ai-assistant/test-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-zl/zelin-ai-assistant/test-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-zl/zelin-ai-assistant/test-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00171 | $0.02937 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.01469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00587 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
test-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/adapters.md 8.5 KB
- references/anti-gaming.md 2.6 KB
- references/catalog.md 7.2 KB
- references/report-template.md 5.3 KB
- references/tiers.md 7.9 KB
- references/triggers.md 4.9 KB
- scripts/checks.py 63 KB runs code
- scripts/complexity_min.py 8.1 KB runs code
- scripts/detect.py 21 KB runs code
- scripts/ladder_common.py 9.2 KB runs code
- scripts/run_ladder.py 25 KB runs code
- scripts/structure_check.py 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 94 lines · 171 tokens per session scan A ad750f888a7e
test-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository Wan-ZL/zelin-ai-assistant (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 2,937 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
develop-web-game
Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with rendergametotext.
swift-testing-pro
Writes, reviews, and improves Swift Testing code using modern APIs and best practices. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing projects that use Swift Testing.
taiyi-dev
A software-development stage that implements planned tasks using test-driven development, or TDD: write a failing test, make it pass, then improve the code. It checks the task plan, dependencies, file boundaries, and required completion evidence.
taiyi-test
A project workflow skill for verifying an implementation and producing a TEST.md record. TDD means writing a failing test, implementing the change, and then making the test pass; this skill checks that process and other regression cases.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.