Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanshuiyin/ARIS-Movie-Directornpx agentmods add skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/aris-movie-director/comic-cross-layer-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.12081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.06041 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01208 |
Grade A, and why
comic-cross-layer-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 529 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
comic-cross-layer-gate — the Universal Authoring Score-Fuser + the Zero-Credit P0 Proof (Phase 1)
The acquittal organ of the comic-author suite. Every authoring step
(intent → style → outline → asset → storyboard → blueprint → continuity → the compiled comic.json) is a
generator; none of them acquits itself. They each emit their node(s), fan out independent reviewers, and
then defer to this one skill to fuse the scores into a verdict, mint the audit trail, and flip the target's
status. It is the image-comic port of aris_movie's 6-gate adversarial decision skill — but folded into one
parameterized fuser (Codex's single-fuser design, against the per-layer split that drifts: six near-copies
diverge, one fuser stays honest). The downstream per-panel panel_gate / page assembly_gate are NOT this
skill — those live in packages/core/spiral_engine.js and run at bake
time; this skill is the authoring-side, pre-bake gate that decides whether a spec may advance.
Cardinal lesson, landed as a guard not prose: identical scores across rounds = the judge is broken — audit the rubric, do not regenerate the artifact (memory:
feedback_gate_identical_scores_judge_broken). Concretely: this gate carries a_score_fingerprintin everydecisionnode; if round N's fused per-dim vector equals round N−1's after the artifact changed, the gate HALTS and flagsjudge_suspect— the rubric (this skill), not the spec, is the suspect. A gate that emits the same verdict regardless of the work is worse than no gate.
upstream step emits node(s) + fans out independent reviewers (writes review:* score-nodes + `reviews` edges)
│
comic-cross-layer-gate <target_node_id> --gate <kind>
▼
⓪ PRE-CHECK structural facts the GATE computes (asset-resolve / policy / count-band / continuity) — RAW, not opinion
▼
① COLLECT reviewer score-nodes via `reviews` edges — NEVER re-run a reviewer; hard-fail if none
▼
② THRESHOLD per-dim min-fuse (max for inverted dims); SKIP missing dims (NEVER 0-substitute); per-gate floor → threshold_verdict
▼
③ ADJUDICATE Codex xhigh (no model pin — local codex config) — sees ONLY {scores + failure_mode tags + threshold_block + raw PATHS + ≤200w verbatim source + verbatim rubric}
▼ (NEVER reviewer prose / notes / overall — that is the contamination vector)
④ ASYMMETRIC threshold HARD-VETO over "advance"; Codex SOFT-VETO over everything else
▼
⑤ WRITE decision node (full audit) + (on FAIL only) a positive-invariant failure_mode the NEXT step preloads as a banlist
▼
⑥ FLIP target status → locked (advance) · under_review (needs-work) · rejected (terminal) ; stdout last line: VERDICT=<v> GATE=<kind> TARGET=<id>
The --gate p0_proof branch is a different shape (a text-only adversarial review of the pipeline machinery,
not a score-fuse over a spec) — it is documented in its own section below. It is the single most important
contract this skill owns: it runs AFTER comic-json-compiler and
BEFORE any metered image bake (the agent mcp__codex__codex sidecar), costs zero generation credits,
and must clear all blockers in BOTH non-author families and then MINT the digest-bound decision:p0_proof_*
certificate via scripts/run_p0_proof.py — or the spiral is forbidden to spend a
credit.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 529 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7106b219b966
comic-cross-layer-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanshuiyin/ARIS-Movie-Director (61 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 12,081 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
continual-learning
Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".