ARIS is a collection of Markdown-based skills that define a workflow for autonomous machine-learning research, including idea discovery, experiment automation, and review loops. Researchers and AI coding agents use it across tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw without depending on a single framework. The catalogue entries are ARIS workflow skills and agents.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepnpx agentmods add skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/resubmit-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.08712 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.03485 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01742 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00871 |
Grade A, and why
resubmit-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- resubmit-pipeline — 94% identical, 45 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 459 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Resubmit Pipeline: Text-Only Microedit Mode
Before each reviewer slot, follow Selectable Reviewers: resolve invocation →
.aris/reviewer.json→ Claude Code default (Codex MCP) withreviewer_route.pythrough the canonical helper resolver, preserving this slot's tier, fresh contexts, source/image inputs and deterministic gates. Codex examples/pins below apply only tobackend=codex; other routes use their own first-call/reply contract. Save the route and actual returned identity; unavailable selections areREVIEW_UNAVAILABLE. Classify acceptance from actual families/completion/scope. Forward invocation reviewer/model/effort overrides to reviewer-bearing children. Generation workers are unchanged.
Compose a polished paper into a new venue under text-only constraints: $ARGUMENTS
Why This Exists
Most ARIS writing workflows assume the input is either a narrative report (Workflow 3) or an in-progress paper that may still need experiments / bib changes / structural edits. Resubmit is a fundamentally different scope:
- The paper is already polished — proofs are done, experiments are done, bibliography is curated.
- The user wants to absorb prior reviewer concerns from a previous venue and re-submit, without introducing new experiments, new citations, or framework changes (LLM hallucination paranoia + tight resubmit timing + closed compute budget).
- The base submission directory is read-only — the new submission must compose into a sibling directory, never mutate prior state.
- Page limit may shrink between source and target venue (e.g., workshop camera-ready → 9-page main).
Existing skills cover adjacent territory but none of this exact composition: /rebuttal builds the OpenReview-style response document, not in-paper microedits; /auto-paper-improvement-loop is the per-round engine but presupposes someone has already chosen the base manuscript, migrated venue format, set the edit whitelist, queued the reviewer feedback, and decided what NOT to change. /resubmit-pipeline fills that orchestration gap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 18d ago Changed · +11 lines 7c2805b261ef
- 1mo ago Changed 11d8c78dcb9f
- 2mo ago Changed 4fa03710fe1f
- 2mo ago First seen · 448 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A c919caf4c1df
resubmit-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep (18,731 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 8,712 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
resubmit-pipeline compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| resubmit-pipelinewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |
| figure-styleaipoch/open-science | Skill | 5.5k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 91 | Claude Code, Codex |
| remote-compute-sshaipoch/open-science | Skill | 5.5k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ml-training-recipesOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs | Skill | 14k | 26d ago | MIT | A | 88 | Claude Code |
| experiment-tracking-swanlabOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs | Skill | 14k | 26d ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ligandmpnnaipoch/open-science | Skill | 5.5k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 100 | Claude Code, Codex |
| presenting-conference-talksOrchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs | Skill | 14k | 26d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code |