Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to warpdotdev/oz-for-oss. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/main/.agents/skills/review-pr-local/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/review-pr-local)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/review-pr-local"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/review-pr-local.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr-local scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Repo-specific review guidance for oz-for-oss
This file is a companion to the core review-pr skill. It does not
redefine the review output schema, severity labels, safety rules, or
evidence rules. It only specializes the override categories the core
skill marks as overridable.
User-facing strings
- Flag interpolated text that would read unnaturally at runtime (e.g. wrong casing after a sentence fragment like "The triage concluded that {summary}").
- Link text should be descriptive (e.g. "triage session on Warp"), not bare URLs or generic "click here" labels.
- Verify that terminology is consistent across related messages in the same PR.
Graceful degradation
- When code renders optional dynamic data (URLs, session links, metadata), flag cases where a missing value would produce empty or broken output. The fix is usually to omit the element entirely and show a short fallback message.
- Prefer starting with generic, user-safe error messages over exposing internal details.
Debugging and observability
- Do not suggest removing session links, workflow URLs, or other debugging context from error paths. These are valuable for post-incident investigation even when the operation failed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 28 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6d173c7350f9
review-pr-local is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/oz-for-oss (307 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 292 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…