Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to warpdotdev/oz-for-oss. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/main/.agents/skills/security-review-spec/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-for-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/security-review-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/security-review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/security-review-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/security-review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/oz-for-oss/security-review-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.02105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00421 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
security-review-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Review Spec Skill
Audit the current spec pull request for security concerns at the design-doc level and fold any findings into the same review.json produced by the base review-spec skill.
Goal
Provide a focused security pass on top of the general spec review. This is a supplement to review-spec, not a separate output. Findings must be merged into the single combined review.json so reviewers receive one cohesive review.
The focus here is high-level design concerns that a security-minded reader would raise on a product or tech spec, not line-by-line code issues. Flag gaps, ambiguities, or design choices that would plausibly lead to an insecure implementation if built as described.
Inputs
- The working directory is the PR branch checkout.
- The workflow usually provides an annotated diff in
pr_diff.txt. - The workflow usually provides the PR description in
pr_description.md. - Spec PRs typically only modify files under
specs/. - Focus on the spec files and sections changed by this PR.
- Default behavior: do not post comments or reviews to GitHub directly.
When to apply this skill
- Apply on spec PRs whenever
review-specis applied. - Do not apply on code PRs handled by
review-pr; those usesecurity-review-prinstead. - Skip the skill entirely when the changed spec content has no plausible security surface (e.g. purely editorial wording changes, typo fixes, or doc structure cleanup). It is better to stay silent than to manufacture findings.
- Do not duplicate findings the base
review-specpass will already raise. If the base review would naturally catch an issue, leave it there rather than re-reporting it from the security pass.
Security concerns to audit
Evaluate the changed spec content against the following concerns. Treat the list as a checklist, not a ceiling — flag other clearly security-relevant design issues when they appear. Stay at the design-doc level: worry about what the spec does or does not commit to, not how it will be coded.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 542567ef133d
security-review-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/oz-for-oss (312 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 2,105 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…