Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/warpdotdev/oz-skills/docs-updatenpx skills add warpdotdev/oz-skills --skill docs-updategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/oz-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00877 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
docs-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- docs-update — 89% identical, 20 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Documentation Bot
Automatically review code changes and update user-facing documentation to keep it synchronized with the codebase. Works across documentation platforms (Mintlify, Docusaurus, GitBook, Fumadocs, etc.) and supports both monorepo and multi-repo setups.
Workflow
1. Identify Significant Code Changes
Determine which commits need documentation updates:
- Find the default branch
- Get recent commits (default: last 24 hours, or accept user-specified timeframe)
- Examine each commit's changes to understand what was modified
Filter for significant changes:
- New features or capabilities
- API changes (new endpoints, parameters, return values)
- Breaking changes
- New configuration options
- New CLI commands or flags
- Changes to user-facing behavior
Skip documentation for:
- Internal refactoring
- Test-only changes
- Minor bug fixes
- Typo corrections in code
- Performance optimizations without user impact
Be conservative: quality over quantity. When in doubt about significance, skip the update.
2. Analyze Documentation Context
Locate documentation:
- Check for documentation directory in current repo (monorepo pattern)
- Look for separate documentation repository in environment
Identify documentation platform: Determine the platform by examining configuration files and directory structure (e.g., Mintlify, Docusaurus, GitBook, Fumadocs, or generic markdown).
Understand documentation style: Read several existing documentation files to identify tone, voice, structure, code example patterns, terminology, and formatting conventions. Check for style guides or contribution documentation.
3. Determine Documentation Updates
Map code changes to documentation needs (new content, modifications, or additions to existing content).
Guidelines:
- Prioritize user-facing changes over implementation details
- Match existing documentation verbosity (some docs are comprehensive, others minimal)
- Preserve existing accurate content—be strictly additive when possible
- Keep content focused and avoid generic advice
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 110 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f904a622557c
docs-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/oz-skills (823 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 877 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.