Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WARROOM-CEO/COREnpx agentmods add skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-checkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warroom-ceo/core/compliance-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.03132 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.01253 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00626 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-check-th scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to compliance-check — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Language: All user-facing output — responses, summaries, and any text the user will read — must be written in Thai (ภาษาไทย). Internal logic, file paths, code snippets, and technical values remain in English.
/compliance-check -- Compliance-th Review-th
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, marketing campaign, or business initiative.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Compliance assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.
Usage
/compliance-check $ARGUMENTS
What I Need From You
Describe what you're planning to do. Examples:
- "We want to launch a referral program with cash rewards"
- "We're adding biometric authentication to our mobile app"
- "We need to process EU customer data in our US data center"
- "Marketing wants to use customer testimonials in ads"
Output
## Compliance Check: [Initiative]
### Summary
[Quick assessment: Proceed / Proceed with conditions / Requires further-th review]
### Applicable Regulations and Policies
| Regulation/Policy | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|-------------------|-----------|-----------------|
| [GDPR / CCPA / HIPAA / etc.] | [How it applies] | [What you need to do]-th |
### Requirements
| # | Requirement | Status | Action Needed |
|---|-------------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | [Requirement] | [Met / Not Met / Unknown] | [What to do]-th |
### Risk Areas
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation |
|------|----------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Most important action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Approvals Needed
| Approver | Why | Status |
|----------|-----|--------|
| [Person/Team] | [Reason] | [Pending] |
### Further Review Recommended
[Areas where outside counsel or specialist review is advised]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 277 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A b814760813dd
compliance-check-th is a skill published in the GitHub repository WARROOM-CEO/CORE (30 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 3,132 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to compliance-check, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…