Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WaterplanAI/agentic-config --skill ac-qa-e2e-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WaterplanAI/agentic-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/waterplanai/agentic-config/ac-qa-e2e-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waterplanai/agentic-config/ac-qa-e2e-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waterplanai/agentic-config/ac-qa-e2e-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waterplanai/agentic-config/ac-qa-e2e-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waterplanai/agentic-config/ac-qa-e2e-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00717 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
ac-qa-e2e-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E Spec Review Command
Validate implementation against spec requirements using browser-based visual proof.
Spec File: $1
Base URL: $2 (default: http://localhost:${DEFAULT_PORT:-5173}/)
Pre-Flight Checks
-
Verify Spec File Exists
- Read spec file from
$1 - If not found: STOP with "Spec file not found: $1"
- Read spec file from
-
Verify playwright-cli Installed
- Run:
playwright-cli --help - If not available: STOP with "playwright-cli not installed. Run: npm install -g @playwright/cli@latest"
- Run:
-
Parse Spec Requirements
- Extract MLOs (Mid-Level Objectives) from Human Section
- Extract acceptance criteria from Details section
- Create validation checklist
Execution
-
Initialize Review Session
- Create output directory:
{PROJECT_ROOT}/outputs/review/<spec-id>/ - Record review start timestamp
- Create output directory:
-
Open Application
- Navigate to base URL:
playwright-cli open <base_url> - Take initial screenshot:
playwright-cli screenshot --output {PROJECT_ROOT}/outputs/review/<spec-id>/01_initial.png - Verify application loads successfully
- Navigate to base URL:
-
Validate Each MLO
- For each Mid-Level Objective: a. Navigate to relevant UI section b. Take screenshot of current state c. Verify visual elements match expected d. Test interactions if applicable e. Document pass/fail with evidence
-
Capture Visual Proof
- Screenshot key states during validation
- Name format:
<NN>_<mlo>_<state>.png - Example:
02_mlo1_button_visible.png
-
Generate Review Summary
Output Format
Generate markdown review summary:
# Review: <spec-title>
**Spec:** $1
**Date:** <ISO date>
**Status:** PASSED | FAILED | PARTIAL
## MLO Validation
### MLO-1: <title>
- Status: PASSED/FAILED
- Evidence: 
- Notes: <observations>
### MLO-2: <title>
...
## Screenshots
| # | Description | Path |
|---|-------------|------|
| 1 | Initial load | {PROJECT_ROOT}/outputs/review/<spec-id>/01_initial.png |
| 2 | MLO-1 validation | {PROJECT_ROOT}/outputs/review/<spec-id>/02_mlo1.png |
## Video Recording
Full session: {PROJECT_ROOT}/outputs/e2e/<timestamp>-review-<spec-id>.webm
## Summary
<brief summary of findings>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 103 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 504378544c79
ac-qa-e2e-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository WaterplanAI/agentic-config (30 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 717 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
selectors
Selector strategy, exploration-first workflow, locator priority order (getByRole then getByLabel then getByPlaceholder then getByText then getByTestId), and feedback/validation-message selector rules for Playwright page objects. Use when creating page objects, writing or updating locators, generating UI tests, or…
vindicate
Use when the user wants to write, add, fix, stabilize (flaky), refactor, run, or audit Playwright browser tests, draft requirements/stories from a recording (no tests), find test-coverage gaps, scaffold a Playwright project, or set up Playwright CI. Vindicate's guided workflow for grounded, conformant Playwright test…
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
browser-testing-with-devtools
Tests in real browsers via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data. Requires the chrome-devtools MCP server to be…
playwright-cli
A command-line tool for controlling Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit browsers, including navigation, page interaction, screenshots, PDFs, and recorded actions.