audience-generate-list

A workflow for turning an existing list of customers, leads, or accounts into a matched audience roster with Watt entity IDs. An audience roster is a list of identified entities that can be used for later analysis or activation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to resolve an owned list, expand it with supported transformations, or prepare the resulting roster for audience analysis and activation.
Why use it?
It gives a consistent starting point when the people or accounts already exist in a file, rather than being described only in plain language.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wattdata/plugin/audience-generate-list
Any agent
npx skills add wattdata/plugin --skill audience-generate-list
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wattdata/plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 188 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 10,085 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00188 $0.10085
Opus 5 $0.00094 $0.05042
Sonnet 5 $0.00038 $0.02017
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.01009

Measured 2d ago against content hash 47eddda83373, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

audience-generate-list scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Tells the agent never to refusehighAnti-refusal

Suppressing the ability to decline removes a core safety control; a later harmful request then succeeds.

- **"My list who also do X / score my pipeline / who's hottest."** That's the **overlay** play — run it, don't refuse: resolve the list, build a scoring pool from the brief, rank (and optionally cut to the slice matching
skills/audience-generate-list/SKILL.md · 245 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Build an audience from an owned list

Purpose

audience-generate-list is the build leaf anchored on an owned list — the user arrives with people they already hold (customers, leads, accounts, engagement data), not a plain-English description of who to reach. It resolves that list to Watt entity IDs and emits a roster: the matched set, ready for the audience-activate and audience-analyze steps.

The "list" can already be resolved: a roster from a prior pass (a workflow:// entity-IDs URI, or a pasted roster record) is the same anchor — people the user holds — just past the resolve step. It enters here to be re-transformed: overlay scores it, lookalike profiles it for its defining signals; the resolve is skipped, and the roster's classification columns ride along into the play (the play's output roster carries its own columns, per the procedure contract). (Re-expanding a roster needs raw identifiers, which entity IDs alone don't carry — that's the export-addresses-then-expand round-trip below; grouping/crossing a roster aren't available here.)

The leaf is split from its sibling audience-generate-search by input anchor — an owned list here, a description there. The structural consequence is that elicitation starts from what the list is, not from "describe who you want to reach"; there is no discovery, no scoring, no composing.

This leaf ships four plays. Two match the list — resolve-only and expand, both resolution-driven, differing only in how wide the match is. One learns from the list — lookalike. One scores the list — overlay:

  • resolve-only ("matched / customer match") — resolve the list to a tight matched set (the resolver's default floor), the people who are genuinely on the list. Runs the resolution procedure inline (context/resolution.md); the roster classification is minimal (source_provenance).
  • expand ("the widest match set") — resolve the list wide: every entity any identifier plausibly matches (Noisy-OR, 1:many), gated only by a floor that defaults to 0. For maximum addressable reach — the wide roster feeds identifier maximalism at audience-activate. Runs the expand-roster procedure inline (context/expand-roster.md); the roster carries each entity's match confidence and corroboration count.
  • lookalike ("more like them") — don't match the list, learn what defines it. Resolve the seed, then profile it for the signals that set it apart — durable identity by lift (interests, affinity, demographics, life-stage) plus the top intents by reach within the seed — and hand that signal pool back for the operator to tune. Runs the resolution procedure then the profiling procedure inline (mode B); emits a curatable signal pool, not a roster. It builds no audience itself — the tuned pool carries into a compose.
  • overlay ("score / rank my list") — resolve the list, then lay a pool of signals over the resolved set and score each person by how many of those signals they express (overlay_score = Σ weightᵢ × matchᵢ; weights default to 1, so the default score is a plain count). Returns the whole list ranked — lead-scoring, "who's hot", prioritize-the-pipeline — and can optionally be cut to the matched slice (keep people expressing ≥ N signals — the intersection, "my list who also do X"). Unlike the other plays, overlay needs a brief for the signal pool — the brief defines the layer to score by, never the population (the list stays the population). Runs the resolution procedure inline, then the parent's discovery + scoring inline to build the scored pool, then the overlay-score procedure inline (context/overlay-score.md) to score and rank.

Read the full file on GitHub · 245 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 245 lines · 188 tokens per session scan C 47eddda83373

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audience-generate-list is a skill published in the GitHub repository wattdata/plugin (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 188 tokens to every session and 10,085 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (tells the agent never to refuse). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens