Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add waybarrios/opencode-power-pack --skill vuln-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waybarrios/opencode-power-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/vuln-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/vuln-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/vuln-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/vuln-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack/vuln-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01560 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00624 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
vuln-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vuln-report — 91% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vulnerability Report
Overview
Draft one disclosure-ready report for one confirmed bug. Keep the report evidence-driven, concrete, and concise. Prefer the section order and phrasing rules in references/report-template.md.
Workflow
- Confirm the report is about one bug only.
- Extract the minimum facts needed to prove the issue:
- vulnerable component or behavior
- attacker-controlled input or missing validation
- preconditions and trust boundary
- exploit result
- practical impact
- strongest reproduction path
- decisive source locations and any relevant fix commit
- Separate demonstrated facts from inference. State assumptions explicitly.
- Draft the report using the required section order from references/report-template.md.
- Always embed at least one fenced code snippet from the decisive code path, and explain what each snippet proves.
- Always convert repository file references and patch references into GitHub markdown links, and prefer embedding those links directly into the surrounding explanation instead of listing them separately.
- Add only the optional sections that materially improve accuracy or triage value.
- Save the final report as
report.mdinside a folder named with the bug's severity identifier (C1,H1,M1, etc.) followed by a lowercase hyphenated slug derived from the final report title. UseCfor Critical,Hfor High,Mfor Medium, sequentially numbered if there are multiple bugs of the same severity. Example:C1-cross-site-websocket-hijacking-re-enabled-by-allow-websocket/report.md. Also, ensure the bug report title and internal references use this ID (e.g., '[C1] Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking'). Do not write reports for Low severity findings — document them in the summary table only. - Remove filler, hedging, and unproven claims before finalizing.
Required Sections
Always include these sections in this order:
SummaryDetailsRoot CauseProof of Concept (PoC)Impact
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A cba9f739f3eb
vuln-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository waybarrios/opencode-power-pack (544 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,560 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vercel-agent
Vercel Agent guidance — AI-powered code review, incident investigation, and SDK installation. Automates PR analysis and anomaly debugging. Use when configuring or understanding Vercel's AI development tools.
oracle
Oracle second-model review: bundle prompts/files, debug, refactor, design.
code-review-web
Review web application code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and stack-specific anti-patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review code, debug a production issue, investigate a build failure, audit security, or check a PR before merging. Triggers on code review, review my code, debug…
ln-44-performance-optimizer
Profiles and improves a measured performance bottleneck; retains only verified improvements.
ln-71-operations-investigator
Diagnoses incidents from operational evidence and proposes recovery; does not change live systems.
ln-96-error-handling-engineer
Implements safe error boundaries, cancellation and user recovery contracts; not telemetry pipelines or durable retry machinery.