Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/waynesutton/markdown-site/gitrulesnpx skills add waynesutton/markdown-site --skill gitrulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waynesutton/markdown-siteWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
gitrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Critical Git Safety Protocol
NEVER USE git checkout TO REVERT CHANGES.
MANDATORY GIT SAFETY RULES:
- NEVER run
git checkout -- <file>without first examining what you're about to destroy - ALWAYS use
git diff <file>to see exactly what changes will be lost - MANUALLY undo changes by editing files to revert specific problematic sections
- Preserve valuable work: if user says changes are bad, ask which specific parts to revert
git checkoutdestroys ALL changes: this can eliminate hours of valuable progress- When user asks to "undo" changes: Read the current file, identify problematic sections, and manually edit to fix them
Why this matters: Using git checkout blindly can destroy sophisticated implementations, complex prompts, provider-specific logic, and other valuable work that took significant time to develop.
Git Safety Rules
NEVER run these commands without explicit user approval:
git reset --hard: Destroys uncommitted changes permanentlygit checkout -- .: Discards all working directory changesgit clean -fd: Deletes untracked files permanentlygit stash drop: Deletes stashed changes
ALWAYS before any git operation:
- Run
git statusfirst to check for uncommitted changes - If there are uncommitted changes, STOP and ASK the user before proceeding
- Suggest
git stashto preserve changes if needed - Never create a commit unless the user explicitly asked for one
If user asks to "revert" something:
- First clarify: revert committed changes or uncommitted changes?
- Show what will be affected before doing anything
- Get explicit confirmation for destructive operations
This rule exists because careless git operations destroyed 2 days of work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 44 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 06e4dd86106c
gitrules is a skill published in the GitHub repository waynesutton/markdown-site (631 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
shieldcn-badges
Create polished shieldcn README badges, badge groups, charts, headers, sponsors grids, and full README hero sections. Use when a user wants shadcn/ui-styled badges, Shields.io replacement, npm/GitHub/CI/status badges, download charts, README header banners, contributor/sponsor images, or README Studio guidance.…
infisical-sync-skill
Expert knowledge for the Infisical Sync Hand — Infisical API reference, vault operations, error patterns, security guidance.
soul-grader
Use when grading, reviewing, rewriting, or approving a Hermes Agent SOUL.md. Uses the SOUL.md field-guide research artifacts as the only normative source for what makes a good SOUL.md.
mb-ads
Create and review ads, and prepare provider-safe launch plans/checks. Flexible entry points: full pipeline (copy + images), copy only, images only, creative variations (hook library), video scripts, long-form video ads/VSL-style paid creative, video repurpose, compliance review, launch-plan, instrumentation, check, or…
mb-think
Combined research, decision, and codification workflow. Use when: (1) Exploring a question before committing (2) Making a decision that needs documentation (3) User says research, decide, figure out, explore, codify, enrich, retire stale source, sharpen this offer, improve the offer, add context, keyword gate, analyze…
anakinscraper
Scrape any website into clean markdown or structured JSON. Anti-detect browser, smart proxy rotation, AI-powered data extraction.