Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wedabro/bro-skills --skill speckit.analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wedabro/bro-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
🎯 Mission
Make sure spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md do not conflict and cover all requirements.
📥 Input
.agents/specs/[feature]/spec.md.agents/specs/[feature]/plan.md.agents/specs/[feature]/tasks.md
📋 Protocol
- Coverage Check: Each User Scenario in the spec → must have task(s) in tasks.md.
- Conflict Check: Plan says to use tech A but tasks reference tech B → ERROR REPORT.
- Constitution Check: Compare plan.md with constitution.md → detect violations.
- Completeness Check: Each data model in the plan → must have a model creation + migration task.
- Gap Analysis table output:
| Spec Requirement | Plan Section | Task ID | Status | |------------------|-------------|---------|--------| | User login | Auth flow | T005 | ✅ OK | | Payment | - | - | ❌ GAP | - Calculate Coverage Score:
(matched / total) × 100%.
📤 Output
- Console: Gap Analysis table + Coverage Score
- File:
.agents/memory/analyze-report.md
🚫 Guard Rails
- Reporting ONLY — DO NOT arbitrarily edit artifacts.
- Each gap must clearly indicate which artifact is missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 35 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A c5a6cd458f67
speckit.analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository wedabro/bro-skills (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 320 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
math-modeling
A workflow for mathematical modelling, where real-world questions are represented with mathematics and solved with code or analysis.
math-modeling
A workflow for mathematical modelling, where real-world questions are represented with mathematics and solved with code or analysis.
科研可视化工具
A research-visualisation workflow for examining data and producing publication-ready charts for scientific papers.
LaTeX工具
A tool for creating, compiling, and checking mathematical modelling papers written in LaTeX, a document system often used for technical writing.
Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text/tables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting/decrypting PDFs, extracting images, and…
DOCX工具
A tool for creating, editing, checking, and converting Microsoft Word DOCX files. It also handles LaTeX research papers, mathematical formulas, tables, tracked changes, and comments.