Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wedabro/bro-skills --skill speckit.checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wedabro/bro-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
🎯 Mission
Extract all functional requirements from spec.md into a trackable checklist.
📥 Input
.agents/specs/[feature]/spec.md.agents/specs/[feature]/tasks.md(if available)
📋 Protocol
- Read spec.md → extract all requirements (from User Scenarios + Success Criteria).
- Create checklist format:
## Functional Requirements - [ ] FR01: User can register an account → T003, T004 - [ ] FR02: User can log in → T005 - [x] FR03: User can view product → T010 ✅ - If there is tasks.md → link each requirement to task IDs.
- Enter status: ✅ Met / ❌ Not Met / ⚠️ Partial.
📤 Output
- File:
.agents/specs/[feature]/checklist.md
🚫 Guard Rails
- Each requirement MUST be quoted from spec.md (not made up).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 30 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A e99b446ee34c
speckit.checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository wedabro/bro-skills (2 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
科研可视化工具
A research-visualisation workflow for examining data and producing publication-ready charts for scientific papers.
math-modeling
A workflow for mathematical modelling, where real-world questions are represented with mathematics and solved with code or analysis.
math-modeling
A workflow for mathematical modelling, where real-world questions are represented with mathematics and solved with code or analysis.
LaTeX工具
A tool for creating, compiling, and checking mathematical modelling papers written in LaTeX, a document system often used for technical writing.
DOCX工具
A tool for creating, editing, checking, and converting Microsoft Word DOCX files. It also handles LaTeX research papers, mathematical formulas, tables, tracked changes, and comments.
Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text/tables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting/decrypting PDFs, extracting images, and…